The Expositor's Bible: The Epistle to the HebrewsEdwards, Thomas Charles
Religion
The Expositor's Bible: The Epistle to the Hebrews
Edwards, Thomas Charles
Bible. Hebrews -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
2. The second essential qualification of a high-priest was authority to
act for men in things pertaining to God, and in His name to absolve the
penitent sinner. Prayer was free to all God’s people and even to the
stranger that came out of a far country for the sake of the God of
Israel’s name. But guilt, by its very nature, involves the need, not
merely of reconciling the sinner, but primarily of reconciling God.
Hence the necessity of a Divine appointment. For how can man bring his
sacrifice to God or know that God has accepted it unless God Himself
appoints the mediator and through him pronounces the sinner absolved? It
is true, if man only is to be reconciled, a Divinely appointed prophet
will be enough, who will declare God’s fatherly love and so remove the
sinner’s unbelief and slay his enmity. But the Epistle to the Hebrews
teaches that God appoints a high-priest. This of itself is fatal to the
theory that God needs not to be reconciled. In the sense of having this
Divine authorization, the priestly office is here said to be an honour,
which no man takes upon himself, but accepts when called thereunto by
God.[79]
How does this apply to the great High-priest Who has passed through the
heavens? He also glorified not Himself to become High-priest. The
Apostle has changed the word.[80] To Aaron it was an honour to be
high-priest. He was authorized to act for God and for men. But to Christ
it was more than an honour, more than an external authority conferred
upon Him. It was part of the glory inseparable from His Sonship. He Who
said to Him, “Thou art My Son,” made Him thereby potentially
High-priest. His office springs from His personality, and is not, as in
the case of Aaron, a prerogative superadded. The author has cited the
second Psalm in a previous passage[81] to prove the kingly greatness of
the Son, and here again he cites the same words to describe His priestly
character. His priesthood is not “from men,” and, therefore, does not
pass away from Him to others; and this eternal, independent priesthood
of Christ is typified in the king-priest Melchizedek. Before He began to
act in His priestly office God said to Him, “Thou art a Priest for ever
after the order of Melchizedek.” When He has been perfected and learned
His obedience[82] by the things which He suffered, God still addresses
Him as a High-priest according to the order of Melchizedek.
FOOTNOTES:
[64] Chap. viii. 4.
[65] Chap. ix. 24.
[66] Cf. chap. x. 21.
[67] Chap. iv. 15.
[68] εὔκαιρον (iv. 16).
[69] Chap. v. 1, 2.
[70] μετριοπαθεῖν.
[71] Lev. xvi. 6.
[72] Chap. vii. 26.
[73] Chap. vii. 28.
[74] Chap. v. 10, 11.
[75] Chap. v. 7.
[76] Luke xxii. 44. The genuineness of the verse is not quite certain.
[77] Cf. John x. 18.
[78] ἀπὸ τῆς εὐλαβείας (v. 7).
[79] Chap. v. 4.
[80] τιμήν (v. 4); ἐδόξασεν (v. 5).
[81] Chap. i. 5.
[82] τὴν ὑπακοήν (v. 8).
CHAPTER V.
_THE IMPOSSIBILITY OF RENEWAL._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account