And that is what we each need. "My soul crieth out for God, for the
_living_ God." And never will that orphaned cry be answered, but in the
possession of Christ, in Whom we possess the Father also. No dead
abstractions--no reign of law--still less the dreary proclamation,
"Behold we know not anything," least of all, the pottage of material
good, will hush that bitter wail that goes up unconsciously from many an
Esau's heart--"My father, my father!" Men will find Him in Christ. They
will find Him nowhere else. It seems to me that the only refuge for this
generation from atheism--if it is still allowable to use that
unfashionable word--is the acceptance of Christ as the revealer of God.
On any other terms religion is rapidly becoming impossible for the
cultivated class. The great word which Paul opposed to the cobwebs of
Gnostic speculation is the word for our own time with all its
perplexities--Christ is the Image of the Invisible God.
II. We have the relation of Christ to Creation set forth in that great
name, "the firstborn of all creation," and further elucidated by a
magnificent series of statements which proclaim Him to be agent or
medium, and aim or goal of creation, prior to it in time and dignity,
and its present upholder and bond of unity.
"The firstborn of all creation." At first sight, this name seems to
include Him in the great family of creatures as the eldest, and clearly
to treat Him as one of them, just because He is declared to be in some
sense the first of them. That meaning has been attached to the words;
but it is shown not to be their intention by the language of the next
verse, which is added to prove and explain the title. It distinctly
alleges that Christ was "before" all creation, and that He is the agent
of all creation. To insist that the words must be explained so as to
include Him in "creation" would be to go right in the teeth of the
Apostle's own justification and explanation of them. So that the true
meaning is that He is the firstborn, in comparison with, or in reference
to, all creation. Such an understanding of the force of the expression
is perfectly allowable grammatically, and is necessary unless this verse
is to be put in violent contradiction to the next. The same construction
is found in Milton's
"Adam, the goodliest man of men since born,
His sons, the fairest of her daughters, Eve."
where "of" distinctly means "in comparison with," and not "belonging
to."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account