In these eleven volumes by Mr. Burroughs there are many observations, and it is more than likely that some of them may be wrong, but it is not possible that any of them could be mixed with observations that Mr. Burroughs knows he never made. If Mr. Burroughs has written a line of sham natural history, which line is it? In a preface to “Wake-Robin,” the author says his readers have sometimes complained that they do not see the things which he sees in the woods; but I doubt if there ever was a reader who suspected Mr. Burroughs of not seeing the things. His reply to these complaints is significant, being in no manner a defense, but an exquisite explanation, instead, of the difference between the nature which anybody may see in the woods and the nature that every individual writer, because he is a writer, and an individual, must put into his book: a difference like that between the sweet-water gathered by the bee from the flowers and the drop of acid-stung honey deposited by the bee in the comb. The sweet-water undergoes a chemical change in being brought to the hive, as the wild nature undergoes a literary change--by the addition of the writer’s self to the nature, while with the sweet-water it is by the addition of the bee. One must be able to walk to an editorial office and back, and all the way walk humbly with his theme, as Mr. Burroughs ever does--not entirely forgetful of himself, nor of me (because he has invited me along); but I must be quiet and not disturb the fishing--if we go by way of a trout-stream. True to the facts, Mr. Burroughs is a great deal more than scientific, for he loves the things--the birds, hills, seasons--as well as the truths about them; and true to himself, he is not by any means a simple countryman who has never seen the city, a natural idyl, who lisps in “Atlantic” essays, because the essays come. He is fully aware of the thing he wants to do, and by his own confession has a due amount of trouble shaping his raw material into finished literary form. He is quite in another class from the authors of “The Complete Angler” and “New England’s Rarities Discovered.” In Isaak Walton, to quote Leslie Stephen, “_a happy combination of circumstances_ has provided us with a true country idyl, fresh and racy from the soil, not consciously constructed by the most skillful artistic hand.” Now the skillful artistic hand is everywhere seen in Mr. Burroughs. What writer in these days could expect happy combinations of circumstances in sufficient numbers for eleven volumes? Albeit a stone house, in a vineyard by the Hudson, seems a very happy combination, indeed! But being an idyl, when you come to think of it, is not the result of a happy combination of circumstances, but rather of stars--of horoscope. You are born an idyl or you are not, and where and when you live has nothing to do with it.