The foreign debt of English literature — John Shaqi
The foreign debt of English literatureTucker, T. G. (Thomas George)
History
The foreign debt of English literature
Tucker, T. G. (Thomas George)
Comparative literature; English literature -- History and criticism
For this there are two reasons. The one is that a large number of
the chief writers of Latin literature are not themselves of unmixed
Latin birth; they possess Celtic blood, or Greek blood, or some other
non-Roman strain. Virgil came from Mantua, Catullus from Verona, Horace
from Venusia, and other writers from other northern, southern, or even
Spanish towns. The second reason is that, before Roman literature had
properly earned the name, it had come into contact with the fully
developed art of Greece, both Attic and Alexandrian, and forthwith
became a literature of imitation. Feeling its limitations, the Latin
genius submitted its own tendencies to the correction of a people whom
it instinctively recognized as superior in this domain. But here an
important qualification must be made. It cannot be too much insisted
upon that Latin literature hardly rose at all till Greek literature was
far decayed. Unhappily, when the Roman writers set about imitating their
masters, they exploited, it is true, the matter or substance of anything
Greek, and of any period, but the style and form which they affected were
rather those of the later and inferior Greeks of Alexandria, not those of
the perfect earlier masters of Attica and Ionia. It is in any case easier
to imitate what is affected or “loud” or artificial than what is simply
and naturally strong and beautiful.
Latin literature, in the sense in which we are to treat it, may be
divided into three main periods. The first is that of immature art,
of vigorous but ill-disciplined imitation of Greek models, of growing
mastery over language. It is a period of preparation, the “iron age,”
corresponding roughly to the period of English literature before the
Revival of Learning. The date of this epoch is from 250 to 80 B.C., and
it embraces the best days of the republic. During all this time the
literature, rough and poor as it was, was sincere enough. It was meant
for the people and for a purpose. For us, however, it contains little of
any consequence besides the comedies of Plautus and Terence.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account