Such a notion is already very complex and must have been relatively late
in appearing; moreover it could not have arisen if the observation of
solid bodies had not already taught us to distinguish changes of
position.
_Therefore, if there were no solid bodies in nature, there would be no
geometry._
Another remark also deserves a moment's attention. Suppose a solid body
to occupy successively the positions [alpha] and [beta]; in its first
position, it will produce on us the totality of impressions _A_, and in
its second position the totality of impressions _B_. Let there be now a
second solid body, having qualities entirely different from the first,
for example, a different color. Suppose it to pass from the position
[alpha], where it gives us the totality of impressions _A'_, to the
position [beta], where it gives the totality of impressions _B'_.
In general, the totality _A_ will have nothing in common with the
totality _A'_, nor the totality _B_ with the totality _B'_. The
transition from the totality _A_ to the totality _B_ and that from the
totality _A'_ to the totality _B'_ are therefore two changes which _in
themselves_ have in general nothing in common.
And yet we regard these two changes both as displacements and,
furthermore, we consider them as the _same_ displacement. How can that
be?
It is simply because they can both be corrected by the _same_
correlative movement of our body.
'Correlative movement' therefore constitutes the _sole connection_
between two phenomena which otherwise we never should have dreamt of
likening.
On the other hand, our body, thanks to the number of its articulations
and muscles, may make a multitude of different movements; but all are
not capable of 'correcting' a modification of external objects; only
those will be capable of it in which our whole body, or at least all
those of our sense-organs which come into play, are displaced as a
whole, that is, without their relative positions varying, or in the
fashion of a solid body.
To summarize:
1º We are led at first to distinguish two categories of phenomena:
Some, involuntary, unaccompanied by muscular sensations, are attributed
by us to external objects; these are external changes;
Others, opposite in character and attributed by us to the movements of
our own body, are internal changes;
2º We notice that certain changes of each of these categories may be
corrected by a correlative change of the other category;
3º We distinguish among external changes those which have thus a
correlative in the other category; these we call displacements; and just
so among the internal changes, we distinguish those which have a
correlative in the first category.
Thus are defined, thanks to this reciprocity, a particular class of
phenomena which we call displacements.
_The laws of these phenomena constitute the object of geometry._
LAW OF HOMOGENEITY.--The first of these laws is the law of homogeneity.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account