This fourth dimension is supposed to run at right angles to any of the
three space dimensions, as the third space dimension runs at right
angles to the two dimensions of a plane, and thus it gives us the
opportunity of generating a new kind of volume. If the whole cube moves
in this dimension, the solid itself traces out a path, each section of
which, made at right angles to the direction in which it moves, is a
solid, an exact repetition of the cube itself.
The cube as we see it is the beginning of a solid of such a kind. It
represents a kind of tray, as the square face of the cube is a kind of
tray against which the cube rests.
Suppose the cube to move in this fourth dimension in four stages,
and let the hyper-solid region traced out in the first stage of its
progress be characterised by this, that the terms of the syllogism
are in the first figure, then we can represent in each of the three
subsequent stages the remaining three figures. Thus the whole cube
forms the basis from which we measure the variation in figure. The
first figure holds good for the cube as we see it, and for that
hyper-solid which lies within the first stage; the second figure holds
good in the second stage, and so on.
Thus we measure from the whole cube as far as figures are concerned.
But we saw that when we measured in the cube itself having three
variables, namely, the two premisses and the conclusion, we measured
from three planes. The base from which we measured was in every case
the same.
Hence, in measuring in this higher space we should have bases of the
same kind to measure from, we should have solid bases.
The first solid base is easily seen, it is the cube itself. The other
can be found from this consideration.
That solid from which we measure figure is that in which the remaining
variables run through their full range of varieties.
Now, if we want to measure in respect of the moods of the major
premiss, we must let the minor premiss, the conclusion, run through
their range, and also the order of the terms. That is we must take as
basis of measurement in respect to the moods of the major that which
represents the variation of the moods of the minor, the conclusion and
the variation of the figures.
Now the variation of the moods of the minor and of the conclusion are
represented in the square face on the left of the cube. Here are all
varieties of the minor premiss and the conclusion. The varieties of
the figures are represented by stages in a motion proceeding at right
angles to all space directions, at right angles consequently to the
face in question, the left-hand face of the cube.
Consequently letting the left-hand face move in this direction we get
a cube, and in this cube all the varieties of the minor premiss, the
conclusion, and the figure are represented.
Thus another cubic base of measurement is given to the cube, generated
by movement of the left-hand square in the fourth dimension.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account