The Gentle Art of Faking: A history of the methods of producing imitations & spurious works of art from the earliest times up to the present dayNobili, Riccardo
History
The Gentle Art of Faking: A history of the methods of producing imitations & spurious works of art from the earliest times up to the present day
Nobili, Riccardo
Art -- Forgeries; Collectors and collecting; Forgery of antiquities
“No art collection,” says Eugene Müntz in his _Les Collections des
Médicis_, “has more deeply influenced the art of the Renaissance, no
collection has passed through more trials than the one of this family.
Ten generations of enthusiastic amateurs have given themselves to its
enrichment; the greatest artists, Donatello, Ghiberti, Verrocchio, the
two Lippi, Ghirlandaio, Botticelli, Leonardo da Vinci, Michelangelo and
Raphael have sought inspiration and models in the Medici collection.
This while, by an unaccountable contradiction, all the revolutions that
troubled the city of Florence seem to have continually threatened the
existence of such an inestimable gathering.”
To be convinced of the extreme importance of the Medici collection
one has but to reflect that what now remains of it in the Florentine
museums or in well-known private hands is only the smallest part of
those past treasures, which has managed to survive the pillage of the
collection in the year 1494, when Piero Medici fled and the Medici
palace was sacked by the populace and the remaining effects sold
and dispersed by order of the Commune. What was later recovered by
the family was only a small part of the collection. An idea of the
magnitude of the Medici museum of art can be gained by perusing the
accurate inventories still remaining in the Florentine archives, the
list of the objects left by Cosimo the Elder to his son Piero and the
catalogue of the collection belonging to Lorenzo il Magnifico, and
finally the account of their money.
A brief study of the character of the two most important collectors of
the Medici family, Cosimo and Lorenzo il Magnifico, will enable us to
judge of the quality and tendencies of the amateur of the Renaissance.
The characteristics of the time in which Cosimo lived and the fact that
he had spent a long period in exile, a misfortune brought upon him by
jealousy, gave his inclinations as an amateur a different course from
what they might otherwise have had. Thus, while on the one hand Cosimo
never lost a chance to help artists and to acquire fine works of art,
he was shrewd enough to do so without ostentation, to avoid arousing
enmity from adversaries. But for this peculiar feeling Cosimo’s palace,
the present Palazzo Riccardi, one of the most sumptuous monuments of
Florence, might have been still more imposing, displaying greater
architectural wealth. It is known that Brunelleschi’s project was
privately preferred by Cosimo, but he did not dare to arouse old
jealousies by too sumptuous a display. Michelozzo’s design was chosen
as the more modest of the two and thus better fitted for the “bourgeois
prince” of Florence. Notwithstanding the necessity for caution even in
liberality, Cosimo encouraged Poggio Bracciolini and many others in
their intelligent search for manuscripts and rare parchments. He had
Niccoli as an invaluable adviser and helper, and left to his son Piero
one of the finest collections of antiques.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account