The Government of England (Vol. I)Lowell, A. Lawrence (Abbott Lawrence)
History
The Government of England (Vol. I)
Lowell, A. Lawrence (Abbott Lawrence)
Great Britain -- Politics and government
The responsibilities of the ministers may be classified as technical and
complete. Thus for acts which happen before they come into office, and
which they could not possibly have advised, they assume what may be
called a technical, or perhaps a nominal, responsibility. A premier is
technically responsible for his own selection; but as responsibility of
that kind means merely the obligation to resign on an adverse vote of
the House of Commons, and as he would be obliged to do this in any
event, he assumes no additional responsibility by reason of his own
selection; and the same thing may be said of all acts which happen
before the ministers come into power, and which they do not by accepting
office effectually sanction or condone. They become responsible, for
example, for the condition of the public departments of which they take
charge; and yet it may be for the very purpose of changing that
condition that they were put in office. In other words, there is a
difference between those things for which they are technically
responsible but not to blame, and those things which have been done by
their advice, and for the consequence of which they may be said to be
morally or completely responsible. The distinction is unimportant from
the point of view of the conventions of the constitution, but its
practical consequences are considerable as regards the position of the
cabinet before Parliament and the public. Now the ministers are
completely responsible for all political acts done by the Crown during
their tenure of office, even those which appear to be most directly the
work of the sovereign himself. All communications with the
representatives of foreign powers, for example, pass through their
hands. The creation of peers, the granting of honours, are now
unquestionably subject to their advice; and although when King Edward's
list of coronation honours was announced in 1901, _The Times_ declared
that the names were the personal choice of the monarch, it took pains to
add that the constitutional responsibility must, of course, rest with
the ministers.[37:1]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account