The greatest story in the world, period 3 (of 3) : $b The development of the modern worldHutchinson, Horace G. (Horace Gordon)
History
The greatest story in the world, period 3 (of 3) : $b The development of the modern world
Hutchinson, Horace G. (Horace Gordon)
World history
Thus there grew everywhere a force of this kind, a force of burghers
or townsfolk, a middle class, which increased in power as the numbers
of townsmen and their riches increased. In England the people, as
against the king, had an advantage which the people of Continental
countries had not, in their legal right to send representatives to
Parliament before contributing to the expense of government. The
right existed, even while they were not able to enforce it. And with
the growth of this new power of the middle class they began to have
greater power for its enforcement, or, at least, greater power to
resist the punishments which the king had tried to impose on those
who refused to supply him with money which had not been legally voted
for his use.
The Tudors, for all their masterfulness, had been {72} more prudent
than the Stuarts proved themselves. Even Henry VIII., in Wolsey's
time, had consented to take only one-half of the sum which he had
demanded as a contribution from the people. And we may often see
that these Tudors, although they dealt so despotically with their
nobility, appear to have kept a finger, as it were, on the pulse of
the nation, and to have known how to give way when that pulse beat
too forcibly in opposition. Perhaps it takes a strong character to
yield, on occasion. Certainly the Tudors had what we should call
strong characters, and they knew how to yield. The Stuarts had less
strength, and they brought the country into cruel trouble by their
inability to yield. Rather, perhaps, we should say, they yielded
when they should have stood firm, and stood firm when they should
have yielded. Had they yielded more discreetly the people would have
had to wait longer for their freedom, though it is possible they
might have won it by less painful means.
And although James's prospects looked so fair when he came to the
throne of England, he yet came to a troubled inheritance. There was
all that trouble between the State Church and the Puritans, a trouble
which grew greater and which perhaps the Scottish element that James
brought down to England with him increased. The Scottish element, if
it were not Roman Catholic in religion, was mainly of the extreme
Puritan type.
There was this double source of trouble, therefore--the king's
illegal endeavour to govern and to extort supplies of money without a
Parliament, and the increasing tension between the persecuted Puritan
party and the party of the State Church. Both Puritans and Catholics
had already suffered some persecution under Elizabeth, and under
James these persecutions became more severe. It was only a year or
two after his accession that the Gunpowder Plot was {73}
discovered--a plot contrived by the Catholics to blow up the Houses
of Parliament and all the legislators therein. After this discovery,
the persecution of the Catholics became more severe than ever.
[Sidenote: The Stuart Kings]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account