The greatest story in the world, period 3 (of 3) : $b The development of the modern worldHutchinson, Horace G. (Horace Gordon)
History
The greatest story in the world, period 3 (of 3) : $b The development of the modern world
Hutchinson, Horace G. (Horace Gordon)
World history
In the first place, the numbers of the fighters on either side was
small--ridiculously small, we may think. The total population of the
countries was nothing like as dense as it is now. But even in
proportion to that lesser population, the fighting forces were small.
In the recent Great War we saw "nations in arms," as has been truly
said. Every man who could possibly be spared from the peace work
that had to be continued if people were to have food to eat and other
bare necessities of life, was pressed into the fighting. In those
older wars only a very few of the population fought. The rest might
go on with their ordinary work, for the most part of an agricultural
kind, so long as their land was lucky enough not to be the scene of
the fighting.
And the troops moved slowly, so that the campaign was restricted to
comparatively small spaces. In the winter there was little or no
fighting. The soldiers went into "winter quarters." Probably this
was largely because the roads were so bad and the country was so
undrained and marshy, that it was almost impossible for them to move
about with any artillery and baggage horses.
Generally they went into the towns for their winter quarters. And if
these towns had walls round them, as in those days many had, they
were tolerably secure within the walls, so long as they had collected
enough provisions, because there was no artillery powerful enough to
batter down a strongly built wall.
Doubtless the misery caused by the perpetual fighting, and the coming
and going of armies during so many years, was very great, even so.
It is said that in the principal areas ravaged by the war the
population {77} was reduced to one-third of what it had been before.
But a consideration of the leisurely way in which the fighting was
conducted, and the small number engaged in it, helps us to realise
how the people of the countries were able to endure it at all. It
also helps us to understand how it was that it took so long to bring
the war to a conclusion.
The Protestant King of Denmark took the lead of the Union at the
beginning of the long struggle, and at first the Protestants suffered
many defeats. The great leader of the Catholics, Wallenstein,
overran Denmark itself. The outlook for the Protestant cause was as
black as it well could be. At this darkest moment Gustavus Adolphus
came with his Swedes from the north, and the Catholics were driven
back. Within a few years he was invading Germany, and in 1632 he
fought the very important battle of Lutzen, in which the Protestant
forces were completely victorious. But it was a victory dearly
bought, for Gustavus himself was killed in the battle and the
Protestant cause found no other leader of equal ability.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account