Jewish philosophy -- Early works to 1800; Judaism -- Works to 1900; Philosophy, Medieval -- Early works to 1800
Apparent contradictions or differences occurring in the Gemara may be
traced to the first cause and to the second, as e.g., “In this
particular case he agrees with this rabbi”; or “He agrees with him in
one point, but differs from him in another”; or “These two dicta are
the opinions of two Amoraim, who differ as regards the statement made
by a certain rabbi.” These are examples of contradictions traceable to
the first cause. The following are instances which may be traced to the
second cause. “Rabba altered his opinion on that point”; it then
becomes necessary to consider which of the two opinions came second.
Again, “In the first recension of the Talmud by Rabbi Ashi, he made one
assertion, and in the second a different one.”
The inconsistencies and contradictions met with in some passages of the
prophetic books, if taken literally, are all traceable to the third or
fourth cause, and it is exclusively in reference to this subject that I
wrote the present Introduction. You know that the following expression
frequently occurs, “One verse says this, another that,” showing the
contradiction, and explaining that either some premise is wanting or
the subject is altered. Comp. “Solomon, it is not sufficient that thy
words contradict thy father; they are themselves inconsistent, etc.”
Many similar instances occur in the writings of our Sages. The passages
in the prophetical books which our Sages have explained, mostly refer
to religious or moral precepts. Our desire, however, is to discuss such
passages as contain apparent contradictions in regard to the principles
of our faith. I shall explain some of them in various chapters of the
present work; for this subject also belongs to the secrets of the
Torah.
Contradictions traceable to the seventh cause occurring in the
prophetical works require special investigation; and no one should
express his opinion on that matter by reasoning and arguing without
weighing the matter well in his mind.
Inconsistencies in the writings of true philosophers are traceable to
the fifth cause. Contradictions occurring in the writings of most
authors and commentators, such as are not included in the
above-mentioned works, are due to the sixth cause. Many examples of
this class of contradictions are found in the Midrash and the Agada;
hence the saying, “We must not raise questions concerning the
contradictions met with in the Agada.” You may also notice in them
contradictions due to the seventh cause. Any inconsistency discovered
in the present work will be found to arise in consequence of the fifth
cause or the seventh. Notice this, consider its truth, and remember it
well, lest you misunderstand some of the chapters in this book.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account