Jewish philosophy -- Early works to 1800; Judaism -- Works to 1900; Philosophy, Medieval -- Early works to 1800
I will now return to complete what I commenced to explain. The nobles
of the Children of Israel, besides erring in their perception, were,
through this cause, also misled in their actions; for in consequence of
their confused perception, they gave way to bodily cravings. This is
meant by the words, “Also they saw God and did eat and drink” (Exod.
xxiv. 11). The principal part of that passage, viz., “And there was
under his feet as it were a paved work of a sapphire stone” (Exod.
xxiv. 10), will be further explained in the course of the present
treatise (ch. xxviii.). All we here intend to say is, that wherever in
a similar connection any one of the three verbs mentioned above occurs,
it has reference to intellectual perception, not to the sensation of
sight by the eye; for God is not a being to be perceived by the eye.
It will do no harm, however, if those who are unable to comprehend what
we here endeavour to explain should refer all the words in question to
sensuous perception, to seeing lights created [for the purpose],
angels, or similar beings.
CHAPTER VI
The two Hebrew nouns ish and ishshah were originally employed to
designate the “male and female” of human beings, but were afterwards
applied to the “male and female” of the other species of the animal
creation. For instance, we read, “Of every clean beast thou shalt take
to thee by sevens,” ish ve-ishto (Gen. vii. 2), in the same sense as
ish ve-ishshah, “male and female.” The term zakar u-nekebah was
afterwards applied to anything designed and prepared for union with
another object. Thus we read, “The five curtains shall be coupled
together, one (ishshah) to the other” (aḥotah) (Exod. xxvi. 3).
It will easily be seen that the Hebrew equivalents for “brother and
sister” are likewise treated as homonyms, and used, in a figurative
sense, like ish and ishshah.
CHAPTER VII
It is well known that the verb yalad means “to bear,” “they have born
(ve-yaledu) him children” (Deut. xxi. 15). The word was next used in a
figurative sense with reference to various objects in nature, meaning,
“to create,” e.g. “before the mountains were created” (yulladu) (Ps.
xc. 2); also, “to produce,” in reference to that which the earth causes
to come forth as if by birth, e.g., “He will cause her to bear
(holidah) and bring forth” (Isa. lv. 10). The verb further denotes, “to
bring forth,” said of changes in the process of time, as though they
were things which were born, e.g., “for thou knowest not what a day may
bring forth” (yeled) (Prov. xxvii. 1). Another figurative use of the
word is its application to the formation of thoughts and ideas, or of
opinions resulting from them; comp. “and brought forth (ve-yalad)
falsehood” (Ps. vii. 14); also, “and they please themselves in the
children (yalde) of strangers” (Isa. ii. 6), i.e., “they delight in the
opinions of strangers.” Jonathan the son of Uzziel paraphrases this
passage, “they walk in the customs of other nations.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account