The hell bombLaurence, William L. (William Leonard)
Philosophy
The hell bomb
Laurence, William L. (William Leonard)
Hydrogen bomb
In addition to unmasking completely the Kremlin’s ultimate intentions to
enslave mankind, and alerting the free nations of the world to the
danger facing them as they had not been alerted since Hitler’s attack on
Poland, the flash of the Korean guns has also shed new light on the
Politburo’s strategy of conquest. The best-informed opinion in the
summer of 1950 holds that the Kremlin has decided on a series of little
wars that would slowly drain our lifeblood and ruin our economy, and
thus bring about the collapse and ruin of the rest of the world’s free
nations, rather than force a global war, German style. Among other
reasons for such a strategy—and there are many logical reasons for it
from Russia’s point of view—is the fact, already become evident in
Korea, that in such little wars, fought with Russian equipment and other
people’s blood, we would not use atomic weapons of any kind, not only
because there are no suitable targets, but because dictates of humanity
make the use of such weapons on little peoples, caught in the net of
Communism, wholly inconceivable. By deciding on a series of little wars,
over a prolonged period, one following the other or coming
simultaneously, Russia may thus figure that she could gain her ultimate
objective in the cheapest possible way, while at the same time making
sure that our atomic-bomb stockpile is wholly neutralized.
If this turns out to be true, we would at least escape atomic warfare,
and since we, and the rest of the civilized world, fervently wish to
avoid being forced to use atomic weapons, this would be all to the good.
But we must also take into consideration the possibility that the very
decision on Russia’s part to wage little wars and avoid a global war may
have been greatly influenced by the fact that we have a large stockpile
of A-bombs while her stockpile is still negligible, forcing her to adopt
a strategy in which our superiority would be nullified. It is also
possible that after her first experience with the production of A-bombs
she may have realized that it would be much too costly to try to catch
up with us and have therefore decided on a strategy in which atomic
weapons could not possibly play any part. On the other hand, it may also
mean that she will not risk a global war until she has built up an
adequate stockpile of her own, meantime softening us up with a series of
little wars.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account