The Heritage of The South: A History of the Introduction of Slavery; Its Establishment From Colonial Times and Final Effect Upon the Politics of the United StatesEarly, Jubal Anderson
History
The Heritage of The South: A History of the Introduction of Slavery; Its Establishment From Colonial Times and Final Effect Upon the Politics of the United States
Early, Jubal Anderson
Slavery -- United States; United States -- Politics and government -- 1861-1865
After the passage of the acts in the United States and Great Britain
abolishing the slave trade, the agitation on the subject of slavery abated
very considerably for a number of years, only, however, to be revived at a
later period in a more virulent form.
In the year 1812, the state of Louisiana, erected out of the territory
of Orleans, was admitted into the Union as a slave state, and that part
of the territory east of the Pearl river and bordering on the Gulf of
Mexico, was added to the territory of Mississippi. The name of Mississippi
was then given to the territory of Louisiana.
In 1816, Indiana was admitted into the Union as a free state, and in 1817,
Mississippi was admitted as a slave state, the residue of the territory of
that name taking the name of Alabama.
In 1818, Illinois was admitted as a free state and in 1819, Alabama came
in as a slave state. This increase of the number of slave states did not
increase the number of slaves, as the slaves introduced into them came
from the older slave states. If any slaves were introduced from Africa or
any foreign country, it was by such evasion of the laws as will take place
under any government, and they were not so introduced to any appreciable
extent.
In 1819, towards the close of the 15th Congress, a bill was introduced
into the House of Representatives to authorize the erection of the state
of Missouri out of part of the territory of that name, and on motion of
Tallmadge, of New York, a clause was inserted in the bill prohibiting
the further introduction of slaves and granting freedom to the afterborn
children of those already there, on arriving at the age of twenty-five,
the proposition being carried by a vote of 87 to 76. This proposed
restriction caused a very excited debate, in the course of which Cobb, of
Georgia, said that "a fire had been kindled which all the water of the
ocean could not put out, and which only seas of blood could extinguish;"
he did not "hesitate to declare that if the northern members persisted,
the Union would be dissolved." The bill, however, passed the House with
the restriction, but in the Senate, the latter was stricken out, the
clause prohibiting the further introduction of slaves by a vote of 24 to
16, and the one freeing the children by a larger vote, there being only 7
votes for retaining it. The House refused to concur with the Senate and
the bill was lost.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account