The Heritage of The South: A History of the Introduction of Slavery; Its Establishment From Colonial Times and Final Effect Upon the Politics of the United StatesEarly, Jubal Anderson
History
The Heritage of The South: A History of the Introduction of Slavery; Its Establishment From Colonial Times and Final Effect Upon the Politics of the United States
Early, Jubal Anderson
Slavery -- United States; United States -- Politics and government -- 1861-1865
In 1848, Wisconsin had been added to the Union as a free state, and there
were now in the Union sixteen free states and fifteen slave states, giving
to the free states the preponderance in the Senate, as they had long had
in the lower House. Neither Utah nor New Mexico was fitted at all for
slave labor, and there was no territory out of which it was likely that
another slave state could be formed, except by the sub-division of Texas,
while there was a prospect for the formation of several more free states,
at no distant day, out of the territory west of the Mississippi and north
of 36° 30´ and on the Pacific coast, the territories of Minnesota and
Oregon having already been organized.
By what was called the Compromise of 1850, the South had gained nothing
whatever, except the abstract principle inserted in the Utah and New
Mexico bills, of non-interference by Congress with the question of
slavery and the submission of the decision of the question to the people
of the territories when they came to frame their state governments,
while the North had gained the rich and growing state of California. The
bill for the restoration of fugitive slaves was in accordance with an
express stipulation in the Constitution, without which it would never
have been adopted. Yet the execution of this law was resisted from the
very beginning and very soon most of the free states passed laws, called
"personal liberty bills" which virtually nullified the act of Congress.
Several collisions ensued between the United States officers in their
efforts to execute the law and mobs in the free states who resisted its
execution, and even members on the floor of Congress denounced the law
and counselled resistance to it. This served to prevent that harmonious
feeling which had been expected from the adoption of the measures of
adjustment, and the new fugitive slave act became soon a dead letter
from the danger, difficulty and expense attending its execution. Not
only was the guaranty contained in the Constitution, and the act of
Congress to enforce it, thus rendered nugatory, but for many years slaves
had been enticed by agents from the North to make their escape and aid
had been furnished them while doing so, under a system which obtained
the designation of "The underground railroad." This was not confined
to citizens merely but was participated in by state officers who were
sworn to support the Constitution of the United States, and instead of
compelling their citizens and officers to comply with the Constitution and
law, many of the free states passed laws to make it a felony for the owner
to arrest his slave or for any one to assist him.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account