The History of a Lie: "The Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion"Bernstein, Herman
History
The History of a Lie: "The Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion"
Bernstein, Herman
Jews; Protocols of the wise men of Zion
In my investigation I naturally examined the works of the Russian arch
anti-Semite, Ippolit Lutostansky, who first accused the Jews of the most
despicable crimes, and then, in 1882, after the occurrence of the
pogroms in the south of Russia, wrote a volume retracting all his
previous anti-Jewish accusations, and declaring anti-Semitism to be
nothing but an outgrowth of ignorance and malice. Several years later he
resumed his anti-Semitic agitation and became one of the most vicious
vilifiers of the Jewish people on the eve of the notorious Beilis affair
which was staged by the Russian government for the purpose of
discrediting the Jews and of justifying the Russian governmental
anti-Jewish policy before the world. After the collapse of the Beilis
prosecution, which involved the absurd charge of ritual murder,
Lutostansky approached several prominent wealthy Jews with an offer to
retract his new charges against the Jews, provided they would pay him a
certain amount of money for his book. The Jews declined to have anything
to do with the charlatan who had caused so much harm to the Jews of
Russia by his monstrous accusations. His works attracted special
attention because of the fact that they were endorsed and supported by
Russian Grand Dukes and by the Dowager Empress of Russia.
While examining one of his books entitled, “The Talmud and the Jews,”
published in 1907, in which he promised the publication of “the
Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion” in his forthcoming volume, I came
upon an amazing passage in his introduction, outlining an alleged secret
plan of the Jews to gain world domination, which I find reproduced,
word for word, with but a few phrases changed, in the epilogue of “the
Russian mystic,” Sergius Nilus. Did Sergius Nilus plagiarize
Lutostansky? Or was it Lutostansky who plagiarized Nilus? Or were they
one and the same person? At any rate, both served the purposes of the
“Black Hundreds” against the Jews, and both employed the same weapons.
Here is a translation of Lutostansky’s introduction:
From Lutostansky’s Introduction, 1907
EXPLANATION OF THE ZIONIST SYMBOLIC SNAKE
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account