‘The millere was a stout carl for the nones, Ful byg he was of brawn and eek of bones; That proved wel, for over al ther he cam At wrastlygne he wolde have alwey the ram[8]. He was short sholdred, brood, a thikke knarre[9], There was no dore that he ne wolde heve of harre[10]. Or breke it at a reunying with his head His berd, or any sowe or fox was reed, And ther to brood, as though it were a spade Upon the cope right of his nose he hade A werte, and ther on stood a toft of herys, Reed as the brustles of a sowes crys; His nose thirles[11] blake were and wyde; A swerd and a bokeler bar he by his syde; His mouth as greet was as a greet forneys, He was a janglere and a goliardeys[12], And that was moost of synne and harlotries, Wel konde he stelen corne and totten thries[13], And yet he hadde ‘a thombe of gold’ _pardee_ A whit cote and a blew hood wered he, A bagge pipe wel konde he blowe and sowne, And ther with al he broghte us out of towne.’ The ‘thombe of gold’ has somewhat puzzled commentators on Chaucer. One thing is certain: that a miller has been traditionally credited with a broad thumb, and the little fish the _Bullhead_ is called _The Millers’ Thumb_, from a fancied resemblance. Every one connected with the navy knows what the ‘purser’s thumb’ is, from the legend that, when serving out their tots of rum to the men, his thumb was invariably inside the measure (doubtless necessitated by the rolling of the old men-of-war), which resulted in a large profit to himself during a long cruise, and this seems to illustrate Chaucer’s meaning, especially as it occurs immediately after the miller’s ill-gotten gains, that by putting his broad thumb into every measure he made thereby gold during the year.