The History of Chemistry, Volume 2 (of 2)Thomson, Thomas
History
The History of Chemistry, Volume 2 (of 2)
Thomson, Thomas
Chemistry -- History
Whether the silica, lime, alumina, magnesia, and iron, that exist in
small quantity in plants, be derived from water and the atmosphere, is
a question which we are still unable to answer. But the experiments
of Schrader, which gained the prize offered by the Berlin Academy,
in the year 1800, for the best essay on the following subject: _To
determine the earthy constituents of the different kinds of corn, and
to ascertain whether these earthy parts are formed by the processes of
vegetation_, show at least that we cannot account for their production
in any other way. Schrader analyzed the seeds of wheat, rye, barley,
and oats, and ascertained the quantity of earthy matter which each
contained. He then planted these different seeds in flowers of sulphur,
and in oxides of antimony and zinc, watering them regularly with
distilled water. They vegetated very well. He then dried the plants,
and analyzed what had been the produce of a given weight of seed, and
he found that the earthy matter in each was greater than it had been in
the seeds from which they sprung. Now as the sulphur and oxides of zinc
and antimony could furnish no earthy matter, no other source remains
but the water with which the plants were fed, and the atmosphere
with which they were surrounded. It may be said, indeed, that earthy
matter is always floating about in the atmosphere, and that in this
way they may have obtained all the addition of these principles which
they contained. This is an objection not easily obviated, and yet it
would require to be obviated before the question can be considered as
answered.
3. Lavoisier's next paper, inserted in the Memoirs of the Academy, for
1771, was entitled "Calculations and Observations on the Project of
the establishment of a Steam-engine to supply Paris with Water." This
memoir, though long and valuable, not being strictly speaking chemical,
I shall pass over. Mr. Watt's improvements seem to have been unknown
to Lavoisier, indeed as his patent was only taken out in 1769, and as
several years elapsed before the merits of his new steam-engine became
generally known, Lavoisier's acquaintance with it in 1771 could hardly
be expected.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account