The history of fashion in France : $b or, the dress of women from the Gallo-Roman period to the present timeChallamel, Augustin
History
The history of fashion in France : $b or, the dress of women from the Gallo-Roman period to the present time
Challamel, Augustin
Clothing and dress -- France -- History
For a long time the artist Mignard enjoyed the pleasant monopoly of
painting portraits of the court ladies, and these Madonnas of his
were so completely the rage, that the Versailles ladies wished to be
distinguished by their “mignarde” faces; they endeavoured to obtain
“mignardise” of expression, they smiled “mignardement,” and put on little
“mignard” affectations. The word became part of our language, and was
used with great frequency in the complimentary talk addressed to women.
Mignard was succeeded by a painter called Largillière; and “mignardise”
began to give way to a colder and simpler style, though still somewhat
tinged with affectation. Mme. de Maintenon on one occasion wore a gown
of dead-leaf damask, quite plain, a head-dress “en battant l’œil,” and a
cross composed of four diamonds on her neck—a cross à la Maintenon. The
_quasi_-queen having thus set the fashion of veils and grim coifs, all
her faithful followers looked like heaps of black and sombre materials.
[Illustration]
[Illustration: Louis XIV 1668 to 1694
Louis XV 1720 to 1760]
CHAPTER XVI.
REIGN OF LOUIS XIV. (CONTINUED).
1705 TO 1715.
Painted faces—Reply of a Turkish ambassador—Ineffectual
criticism—Mme. Turcaret’s “pretintailles”—Mme. Bonnet’s
law-suit—Brocaded materials—“Andriennes”—“Criardes”—Return
of “hoops” and paniers—A sailor’s leap—Actresses’ paniers,
and the Greek head-dress—Mme. de Létorières—D’Hèle arrives
frozen at the Café Procope—Waterproofs—Finishing touches—Fans
and fan-makers in the seventeenth century—What Mme. de
Staël-Holstein thought of fans—Transition.
“The women of this district (Versailles),” writes La Bruyère, “hasten
the decline of their beauty by the use of artifices which they imagine
will increase their charms; they paint their lips, cheeks, eyebrows,
and shoulders, and liberally display them as well as their bosom, arms,
and ears.... If by the fault of nature women became such as they make
themselves by art, that is to say, if their complexion suddenly lost all
its freshness, and looked as fiery and leaden as they make it by the use
of rouge and paint, they would be inconsolable.” And he adds: “If their
wish is to be pleasing to men, if it is for the men’s sake that they lay
on their white and red paint, I have inquired into the matter, and I can
tell them that in the opinion of men, or at least of the great majority,
the use of white paint and rouge makes them hideous and disgusting; and
that rouge, by itself, both ages and disguises them.”
This reminds us of the reply of a Turkish ambassador who, on being
questioned as to the beauty of Frenchwomen, said, “I am no judge of
painting.”
La Bruyère criticized sharply; while Fénelon, with characteristic
gentleness, pointed out that the elegant simplicity of the antique races
was far more favourable to beauty than the fashions of the day, which
were tending more and more to affectation and over-ornament.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account