The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documentsStone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
History
The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documents
Stone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
Great Britain -- History -- Tudors, 1485-1603; Mary I, Queen of England, 1516-1558
Soon after Anne’s visit to Hatfield, Elizabeth was removed to the
More, and Mary, thinking that she would prejudice her own and her
mother’s cause by consenting to go in her suite, declared that she
had no objection to go to the same place either before or after
Elizabeth, but that she would not pay court to her on the road, unless
she was led by force. She was accordingly put into a litter, when
she took the opportunity of making a public protest. Chapuys thought
this ill-advised, since it might only serve to irritate the King, and
draw upon herself worse treatment than before, “at the desire of his
mistress, who is constantly plotting the worst she can against the
Princess”.
[Illustration: SIR THOMAS MORE, LORD CHANCELLOR OF ENGLAND.
From the original portrait by Holbein.]
The shrewdness of the ambassador was not at fault, and Mary was treated
more rigorously than ever. When Henry paid a visit of two days to the
More, she was commanded not to leave her room, and was told that her
father did not care in the least, whether she renounced her title or
not, since by statute she was now declared illegitimate, and incapable
of succeeding. It was also reported to her, that Henry had said he
would make her lose her head, for violating the laws of his realm. She
was constantly watched, so that it was extremely difficult for her to
communicate this new danger to Chapuys. Her ingenuity provided her,
however, with a means which proved successful. Her old schoolmaster
and friend, Master Featherstone, happened to be in the house, and Mary
asked to speak with him privately. This being refused, she contrived to
tell him what she wished he should know, without exciting the suspicion
of the bystanders. She began to say to him that she had been now so
long without speaking Latin, that she could not say two words properly,
and he desiring to judge for himself, asked her to say something in
that language. Then she told him what the King had said that day, no
one present understanding Latin. He was astounded, and could only
answer, that that was not good Latin, and immediately sent to inform
Chapuys,[125] who related the occurrence to the Emperor. In the same
despatch the envoy says:—
“It is feared the King will put to death the Bishop of Rochester, and
Mr. More, late Chancellor, who, as I lately wrote, are confined in the
Tower with others, for refusal to swear. The Scotch ambassadors laugh
at this King, with good reason, for imagining to strengthen his cause
and his laws by this oath violently extorted, for it rather tends to
show that they are worth nothing, since they require such help to
maintain them.”
On the 14th May he wrote:—
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account