The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documentsStone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
History
The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documents
Stone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
Great Britain -- History -- Tudors, 1485-1603; Mary I, Queen of England, 1516-1558
Dr. Buttes urged the responsibility he would incur in attending her,
unless she were within reach of her mother’s medical adviser and
apothecary, for in the event of her death he might be accused of foul
play. Chapuys expressed a hope that some of Mary’s old and loyal
servants would be sent to her, to keep her cheerful; but he recommended
that her governess should not be changed, for he feared lest some one
should give her a slow poison; whereas Anne’s aunt had long been warned
that she would be suspected, if anything untoward happened to her
charge. There was, she was told, a common belief in London, that she
had already attempted to poison the Princess, so that the poor creature
was terribly alarmed, and could do nothing but weep and lament whenever
Mary was ill. Cromwell agreed that Chapuys’ demands were just, “but
matters,” he said, “were rather hard of digestion, and he couldn’t get
his master to chew them”.
In spite of all efforts, nothing was done to better Mary’s condition.
But her illness abated, and on the 23rd March the ambassador told
Cardinal Granvelle, that the Princess was well again, and “better than
some would have her. She may be called,” he continued, “the paragon of
beauty, goodness and virtue.” But she was constitutionally delicate,
and suffered all her life, from a malady aggravated by the grief and
sorrow which overwhelmed her in her youth. The violent attack which
prostrated her in the beginning of 1535 followed immediately upon the
information that had been conveyed to her at Christmas, of the statute
lately framed against those who refused to acknowledge the King’s
second marriage, and upon the command made directly to her, to renounce
her title and her mother’s, and to take the oath of supremacy. A
refusal, she was told, rendered her liable to instant imprisonment, and
danger of death.
In clinging to mere formulas, Mary was influenced by no pride or
obstinacy, for in yielding she would have implicitly repudiated her
mother’s marriage, and have admitted a slur on her own birth. While
maintaining her title she vindicated both.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account