The history of our Navy from its origin to the present day, 1775-1897, vol. 2 (of 4)Spears, John Randolph
History
The history of our Navy from its origin to the present day, 1775-1897, vol. 2 (of 4)
Spears, John Randolph
United States. Navy -- History; United States. Navy -- History -- Spanish-American War, 1898
The end of it was that Captain Dacres was carried on board the
_Constitution_. He had been wounded, but was able to climb the
rope-ladder to her deck, and there he found Captain Hull awaiting
him. It was a notable meeting in more ways than one--physically among
the rest. For Hull was short, rotund, and jolly--very much like our
portraits of John Bull--while Dacres was tall, lank, and serious--not
much different from a typical New Englander. Hull helped the beaten
captain to the deck, saying heartily: “Dacres, give me your hand, I
know you are hurt.” A moment later Captain Dacres made a formal offer
of his sword, but Hull refused it.
“No, no,” he said, “I will not take a sword from one who knows so well
how to use it; but I’ll trouble you for that hat.”
This apparently incongruous remark was due to the fact that when Dacres
had met Hull socially before the war he had offered to bet a hat that
the _Guerrière_ would whip the _Constitution_ if they ever met, and
Hull accepted the bet.
It was on the afternoon of August 21, 1812, that the wreck of the
_Guerrière_ was fired and blown to the four winds of heaven by the
triumphant Yankees, and from that day to this the naval writers of
both England and America have been trying to tell how it was that
the _Guerrière_ was so badly beaten in so short a time. A half-dozen
different explanations may be found in the books of any great nation,
and all are very much alike, even though written by partisans. They
give the details of the battle, how the ships approached each other;
how they veered and wore; how the crews cheered; how they fired
the guns; how the splinters flew; how the blood flowed from the
scuppers--of one ship; how with great reluctance the one surrendered.
Then with one accord the writers set to work to examine the hulk of
the _Guerrière_. Was it sound or rotten? They counted the guns. How
many did each ship have in a broadside? They measured the calibres
of the guns. They weighed the projectiles. “Why, blow me, sir! The
_Constitution_ had long twenty-fours to our eighteens!” “All right, but
by gosh, our shot were seven per cent. under weight!” They considered
the gunpowder chemically to see whether or not it had deteriorated on
the _Guerrière_. They counted the crews. They considered every little
detail.
As we look back at a distance of eighty-five years upon the battle it
must seem to a candid student of naval matters that the excuses and the
explanations were hardly worthy of the great peoples engaged in making
them. Nevertheless, because it is the conventional thing, these details
shall be given here:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account