The history of the Bastile, and of its principal captivesDavenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
History
The history of the Bastile, and of its principal captives
Davenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
Bastille -- History; Political crimes and offenses -- France; Prisons -- France -- History
Harassed and impoverished by tyranny and exaction within the walls, and
beset by foes beyond them, the Parisians were hungering for peace. They
were the more inveterate against Armagnac, because they were tantalized
by the object for which they longed being almost within their reach.
Peace had, in fact, been concluded at Montereau, and publicly announced
in Paris, and the count, seconded by de Marle, the chancellor, was the
sole obstacle to its being enjoyed. He was inflexible in his resistance.
To bring about a rupture of the treaty, he sent troops to attack two of
the Burgundian posts; seemingly struck with a judicial blindness, the
forerunner of his fall, he pushed to an unbearable length his arrogance,
extortion, and gloomy precautions; and he is said to have even meditated
a sweeping massacre of such of the citizens as were hostile to him,
and to have ordered leaden medals to be struck for distribution to his
partisans, that the murderers might distinguish them in the hour of
carnage. If the character of the man, and the spirit of those barbarous
times, were not in accordance with this sanguinary project, we might,
perhaps, imagine him to be unjustly charged with it; for, in all ages,
it has been the custom to blacken an overthrown tyrant, by loading him
with imaginary crimes. That, however, it was possible for persons of
the highest rank to tolerate, and probably to command, the cold-blooded
slaughter of their foes, was but too speedily proved.
Terrible as the multitude is when once moved, it is slow to be moved.
Mutual distrust, and the dread of failure, keep its component parts
from uniting, till some one, more daring than the rest, or provoked
into action by flagrant wrongs, assumes the lead, and gives to it the
principle of cohesion. It was a denial of justice which brought into
play the man who was wanting, to convert into open revolt the passive
disaffection of the citizens. The servant of an Armagnac noble having
grossly maltreated Perinet le Clerc, whose father, an ironmonger, was the
quartinier, or magistrate of his ward, Perinet applied to the provost
for redress. His application was contemptuously rejected, and he swore
to be revenged. In concert with some of his friends, he matured a plan
for admitting the Burgundian troops, and he opened a correspondence on
the subject with Villiers de l’Isle Adam, who commanded at Pontoise, for
the duke. The chance of success seemed so fair, that l’Isle Adam readily
agreed to risk a portion of his garrison in the attempt. The negotiation
was conducted with so much secrecy that not a breath of it transpired.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account