The history of the Bastile, and of its principal captivesDavenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
History
The history of the Bastile, and of its principal captives
Davenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
Bastille -- History; Political crimes and offenses -- France; Prisons -- France -- History
It required, however, something more than a joke to shake the confidence
which the monarch placed in the cardinal. That something more was not
slow in coming. Since the treaties of Conflans and Peronne, it had been a
main object of Louis to dissociate his brother, the duke of Berry, from
his dangerous adviser the duke of Burgundy; and, as one means towards
effecting this, he strove hard to induce him to accept, as an appanage,
the duchy of Guienne and the government of Rochelle, instead of the
provinces of Champagne and Brie, which, by the treaty of Peronne, he had
been compelled to confirm to his brother. Louis was undoubtedly justified
in wishing to accomplish this object, as there was little chance that
peace would be preserved if the duke of Berry became an immediate
neighbour of the duke of Burgundy. Nor was the equivalent which the king
offered for Champagne and Brie an inadequate one, but much the contrary.
On this occasion, the king suffered the penalty to which all deceivers
are subjected, that of not being trusted. Could the duke of Berry have
put faith in his brother, he no doubt would have accepted Guienne.
It was with no less surprise than indignation that the king discovered,
by intercepted letters, that all his efforts, not only in this case but
in others, had been counteracted by the man on whom he most relied.
The cardinal, and his friend and agent William d’Haraucourt, bishop
of Verdun, were in close correspondence with his enemies. It was to
revenge himself for the king having failed in his promise, to procure
him a cardinal’s hat, that d’Haraucourt entered into the plot against
him. It would seem that nothing short of madness could have prompted
the cardinal to peril his liberty and fortune, perhaps his life, by his
treasonable proceeding. But here again the king was whipped by his own
vices. Balue perceived or imagined that his influence was declining, he
was convinced that it would wholly expire whenever his services were no
longer necessary to the monarch—Louis being, in his opinion, incapable
of personal attachment—and he therefore resolved to place him in such
a situation, by making the king’s foes formidable, that those services
should be always indispensable. On his being interrogated, he avowed,
with a shameless candour, that, for this purpose, he had betrayed the
secrets of the state to the Burgundian duke, encouraged the duke of Berry
to refuse the proposed exchange, advised the calamitous interview and
disgraceful treaty of Peronne, and recommended to Charles of Burgundy to
compel the king to accompany him on the expedition against the revolted
citizens of Liege.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account