The history of the condition of women, in various ages and nations (vol. 2 of 2) : $b Comprising the women of Europe, America, and South Sea IslandsChild, Lydia Maria
History
The history of the condition of women, in various ages and nations (vol. 2 of 2) : $b Comprising the women of Europe, America, and South Sea Islands
Child, Lydia Maria
Women -- History; Women -- Social conditions
A love for exciting amusements kept pace with other forms of
dissipation. Women, not content with music and dancing, and the
entertainments of the theatre, began to delight in horse-races, and
the contests of wild beasts and gladiators, during which scenes of
cruelty occurred too shocking to be described. Sometimes they fought
on the arena with men, at the command of the despotic emperors. The
celebration of the Bacchanalian mysteries, in which women took an
active part, were a continuation of the most indecent and horrid
crimes. In many instances they danced on the stage entirely without
clothing, and enjoyed the luxury of public baths promiscuously with the
men, totally disregarding the modest regulations of former times.
Roman husbands, from the earliest times, had the power of divorcing
their wives whenever they pleased; and afterward the laws were
equalized to such a degree, that either party had liberty to demand
divorce. If the wife was blameless, she received all her dowry and
goods; if culpable, the husband was allowed to retain a sixth part for
each child; if she had been unfaithful to him, he kept all the dowry
and marriage-presents, even if he had no children by her. Where there
was a family, each of the parties settled a proportionable part of
their fortune.
Notwithstanding the facility of divorce, five hundred and twenty-one
years elapsed without an instance of it in Rome. Carvilius Ruga was
the first one who repudiated his wife. He had great affection for
her, and parted from her merely because she brought him no children.
Notwithstanding this excuse, the Roman citizens were very indignant at
the proceeding. But divorces gradually became frequent, and were made
upon the slightest pretexts. When Paulus Æmilius repudiated Papiria,
his friends said to him, “Is she not wise? Is she not fair? Is she
not the mother of fine children?” In reply, he pointed to his shoe,
and said, “Is it not fine? Is it not well made? Yet none of you know
where it pinches me.” Sulpicius Gallus turned away his wife because
she appeared bare-headed in public. Sempronius Sophus separated from
his, because she had whispered to a freed-woman. Antistius Vetus did
the same because his wife went to some public place of amusement
without his knowledge. Cicero separated from Terentia on account of
her extravagance and imperious temper; he espoused Publilia, a young
heiress, who had been his ward; but he repudiated her for harsh
treatment to his daughter Tullia. Cato gave up his wife Martia, by whom
he had had several children, that Hortensius might marry her; and when
some time after Hortensius died, and left her to inherit his great
wealth, to the prejudice of his own son, Cato retook her. Some men
married women of tarnished reputation, on purpose to find opportunity
to divorce them and retain their dowry.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account