The History of the Crusades (vol. 2 of 3)Michaud, J. Fr. (Joseph Fr.)
History
The History of the Crusades (vol. 2 of 3)
Michaud, J. Fr. (Joseph Fr.)
Crusades
you how easy a matter it would be to wrest the empire from the hands
of a tyrant hated by his subjects, for your valour loves obstacles and
delights in dangers; nor will we spread before your eyes the riches of
Byzantium and Greece, for your generous souls aim at nothing in this
conquest, but the glory of your arms and the cause of Jesus Christ.”
“If you overturn the power of the usurper in order that the legitimate
sovereign may reign, the son of Isaac promises, under the faith of
oaths the most inviolable, to maintain, during a year, both your
fleet and your army, and to pay you two hundred thousand silver marks
towards the expenses of the war. He will accompany you in person in
the conquest of Syria or Egypt; and if you think proper, will furnish
ten thousand men, as his portion of the armament; and, moreover, will
maintain, during the whole of his life, five hundred knights in the
Holy Land. But that which must weigh above all other considerations,
with warriors and Christian heroes, is that Alexius is willing to
swear, on the holy Gospel, to put an end to the heresy which now
defiles the empire of the East, and to subject the Greek Church to the
Church of Rome. So many advantages being attached to the enterprise
proposed to you, we feel confident you will listen to our prayers. We
see in Holy Writ that God sometimes employed men the most simple and
the most obscure to make known his will to his chosen people; on this
occasion, it is a young prince he has appointed the instrument of his
designs; it is Alexius that Providence has commissioned to lead you in
the way of the Lord, and to point out to you the road you must follow
to render certain the triumph of the armies of Jesus Christ.”
This discourse made a strong impression upon a great number of the
knights and barons, but it did not command the suffrages of the whole
assembly. The doge and the lords dismissed the ambassadors, telling
them they would deliberate upon the proposals of Alexius. Warm debates
then ensued in the council; those that had been averse to the siege of
Zara, among whom the abbot of Vaux de Cernai was still conspicuous,
opposed the expedition to Constantinople with great vehemence; they
were indignant that the interests of God should be placed in the
balance against those of Alexius; they added that this Isaac, whose
cause they were called upon to defend, was himself an usurper, elevated
by a revolution to the throne of the Comnenas; that he had been, during
the third crusade, the most cruel enemy of the Christians, the most
faithful ally of the Turks; as for the rest, the nations of Greece,
accustomed to the change of masters, supported the usurpation of
Alexius without murmuring, and the Latins had not quitted their homes
to avenge the injuries of a people that really did not call upon them
for aid.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account