The History of the Devils of Loudun, Volumes I-III: The Alleged Possession of the Ursuline Nuns, and the Trial and Execution of Urbain Grandier, Told by an Eye-witnessDes Niau
History
The History of the Devils of Loudun, Volumes I-III: The Alleged Possession of the Ursuline Nuns, and the Trial and Execution of Urbain Grandier, Told by an Eye-witness
Des Niau
Couvent des Ursulines (Loudun, France); Demoniac possession; Grandier, Urbain, 1590-1634
[12] Boot or Bootikin, an instrument of judicial torture formerly used
as a means of extorting confessions or evidence. It was originally
brought from Russia, and consisted of a narrow wooden box made by
nailing four planks together, and the leg of the prisoner being placed
in it, wedges were inserted between the calf of the leg and the sides
of the box, and struck home with a mallet. Sometimes a case of iron was
used in a similar way, and occasionally the wedges were placed against
the shin bone. The torture, which was of the most horrible character,
was sometimes administered until the limbs were wholly crushed and
rendered for ever useless. In the judicial records of Scotland there
are many instances given of the application of the boot, and some of
the details are of the most revolting character. It was last used in
1690, when an English gentleman named Neville Payne was, by the express
command of William III., submitted to the torture of the thumb-screw
and boot, and which in his case were applied with fearful severity.
It is believed that all judicial torture had been given up in England
about fifty years previous to this, and it was finally abolished by 7
Anne, c. 20.
[13] "There have been many found in whom such characters have
concurred, as by the observation of all ages and nations, are symptoms
of a witch; particularly the witch's marks, _mala fama_, inability to
shed tears, etc., all of them providential discoveries of so dark a
crime, and which, like avenues, lead us to the secret of it. 'Tis true,
one man, through the concurrence of corrosive humours, may have an
insensible mark, another may be enviously defamed, and a third, through
sudden grief or melancholy, not be able to weep. One or other of these
may concurr in the innocent, but none do attest that all of them have
concurred in any one person but a witch; and 'tis reasonable to think
that these indicia taking place in witches through all places in the
world, do proceed from a common cause, rather than a peculiar humour.
'Tis but rational to think that the devil, aping God, should imprint
a sacrament of his covenant; and it is thought by many, of greatest
repute in the learned world, that whatsoever way, whether by accident
or otherwise, such insensible marks be in the body, yet no such mark as
theirs, every circumstance considered, is to be found with any other
but themselves. I need not insist much in describing this mark, which
is sometimes like a little teate, sometimes but a blewish spot; and I
myself have seen it in the body of a confessing witch, like a little
powder-mark, of a blea colour, somewhat hard, and withall insensible,
so as it did not bleed when I pricked it."--_A Discourse of Witchcraft,
by Mr. John Bell, Minister of the Gospel at Gladsmuir_, 1705, _MS._
[Quoted by T. D. Morison in his Edition of Sharpe's Witchcraft.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account