The History of the Popes: From the Foundation of the See of Rome, to the Present Time, 3rd Ed. Vol. 1Bower, Archibald
History
The History of the Popes: From the Foundation of the See of Rome, to the Present Time, 3rd Ed. Vol. 1
Bower, Archibald
Catholic Church -- History; Papacy -- History; Popes -- Biography
separated himself from their Communion; which was no more than every
Bishop had Power to do. _Victor_ being thus baffled in his Attempt, his
Successors took care not to revive the Controversy; so that the
_Asiatics_ peaceably followed their antient Practice till the Council of
_Nice_, which, out of Complaisance to _Constantine the Great_, ordered
the Solemnity of _Easter_ to be kept every-where on the same Day, after
the Custom of _Rome_[284].
This Dispute happened, not in the Reign of _Commodus_, as we read in the
_Synodicon_[285], but in the Fourth Year of the Reign of _Severus_, as
St. _Jerom_ informs us[286], of Christ 196. [Sidenote: Victor _dies_.]
_Victor_, of whom we find nothing else in the Antients worthy of Notice,
died Five Years after[287], that is, in the Ninth of the Emperor
_Severus_, and in the End of 201. or the Beginning of 202. of Christ,
having governed the Church Ten Years. He is named, by St. _Jerom_, the
first among the Ecclesiastical Authors that wrote in _Latin_[288].
[Sidenote: _His Works._] He published a Piece, on the Controversy about
the Celebration of _Easter_, and some other Books on religious Subjects,
which were still extant in St. _Jerom_’s Time[289]. [Sidenote: _Pieces
falsly ascribed to him._] As for the Two Decretals that are ascribed to
him, and the Two Letters to _Desiderius_ and _Paracoda_, both Bishops of
_Vienne_, they are universally rejected[290]. [Sidenote: _He is
sainted._] The Church of _Rome_ has placed _Victor_ among her Saints;
and truly, his Attempt, however unsuccessful, to promote the Power and
extend the Jurisdiction of that See, deserved no less a Reward.
-----
Footnote 261:
Vide Euseb. l. 5. c. 28.
Footnote 262:
Epiph. hær. 54. c. 1. Euseb. l. v. c. 28.
Footnote 263:
Euseb. ib.
Footnote 264:
Idem ib.
Footnote 265:
Tert. in Prax. c. 1.
Footnote 266:
Bar. ad ann. 173. n. 4.
Footnote 267:
Bell. de sum. Pont. l. 4. c. 8.
Footnote 268:
Euseb. l. 5. c. 23. 25. Socrat. l. 5. c. 21. Epiph. hær. 70. c. 10.
Footnote 269:
Euseb. l. 5. c. 24.
Footnote 270:
Idem ib.
Footnote 271:
Idem. ib. c. 20.
Footnote 272:
Concil. per Labb. t. 1. p. 150.
Footnote 273:
Euseb. l. 5. c. 22. et 24.
Footnote 274:
Hier. vir. ill. c. 45.
Footnote 275:
Euseb. l. 5. c. 24.
Footnote 276:
Idem ib.
Footnote 277:
Idem ib.
Footnote 278:
Idem ib. Hier. vir. ill. c. 45.
Footnote 279:
Euseb. l. 5. c. 24. Socrat. l. 5. c. 22.
Footnote 280:
Euseb. ib.
Footnote 281:
Euseb. ib. et Socrat. l. 5. c. 22.
Footnote 282:
Euseb. ib. Hier. vir. ill. c. 35. Phot. c. 120. Cypr. ep. 75. Anast.
p. 445.
Footnote 283:
Bar. ad ann. 198. n. 10.
Footnote 284:
Euseb. vit. Const. l. 3. c. 18. Soz. l. 1. c. 16. Concil. l. 3. c. 18,
19. p. 492.
Footnote 285:
Concil. Labb. t. 1. p. 601.
Footnote 286:
Hier. vir. ill. c. 43. et chron.
Footnote 287:
Euseb. l. 5. c. 28. Hier. chron.
Footnote 288:
Hier. de vir. ill. c. 34. 40.
Footnote 289:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account