The House of Quiet: An AutobiographyBenson, Arthur Christopher
General
The House of Quiet: An Autobiography
Benson, Arthur Christopher
Country life -- England -- Fiction; English fiction -- 20th century; Invalids -- Fiction
Mr. Woodward was of course adored by the people of the village. In his
trim garden lived a couple of pea-fowl—gruff and selfish birds, but very
beautiful to look at. Mr. Woodward had a singular delight in watching
the old peacock trail his glories in the sun. They roosted in a tree
that overhung the road. There came to stay in the next village a sailor,
a ne’er-do-weel, who used to hang about with a gun. One evening Mr.
Woodward heard a shot fired in the lane, went out of his study, and found
that the sailor had shot the peacock, who was lying on his back in the
road, feebly poking out his claws, while the aggressor was pulling the
feathers from his tail. Mr. Woodward was extraordinarily moved. The man
caught in the act looked confused and bewildered. “Why did you shoot my
poor old bird?” said Mr. Woodward. The sailor in apology said he thought
it was a pheasant. Mr. Woodward, on the verge of tears, carried the
helpless fowl into the garden, but finding it was already dead, interred
it with his own hands, told his sister at dinner what had happened, and
said no more.
But the story spread, and four stalwart young parishioners of Mr.
Woodward’s vowed vengeance, caught the luckless sailor in a lane,
broke his gun, and put him in the village pond, from which he emerged
a lamentable sight, cursing and spluttering; the process was sternly
repeated, and not until he handed over all his available cash for the
purpose of replacing the bird did his judges desist. Another peacock was
bought and presented to Mr. Woodward, the offender being obliged to make
the presentation himself with an abject apology, being frankly told that
the slightest deviation from the programme would mean another lustral
washing.
The above story testifies to the sort of position which Mr. Woodward held
in his parish; and what is the most remarkable part of it, indicates
the esteem with which he was regarded by the most difficult members of
a congregation to conciliate—the young men. But then Mr. Woodward was
at ease with the young men. He had talked to them as boys, with a grave
politeness which many people hold to be unnecessary in the case of the
young. He had encouraged them to come to him in all sorts of little
troubles. The men who had resented the loss of Mr. Woodward’s peacock
knew him as an intimate and honoured family friend; he had tided one
over a small money difficulty, and smoothed the path of an ambition
for another. He had claimed no sacerdotal rights over the liberties of
his people, but such allegiance as he had won was the allegiance that
always waits upon sympathy and goodwill; and further, he was shrewd
and practical in small concerns, and had the great gift of foreseeing
contingencies. He never forgot the clerical character, but he made it
unobtrusive, kept it waiting round the corner, and it was always there
when it was wanted.
[Sidenote: THE PROFESSOR]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account