Henry Street Settlement (New York, N.Y.); Poor -- New York (State) -- New York
Bessie and Jimmy and Pippa and Esther and their little comrades stir
us to contribute our human documents to the propaganda instituted in
behalf of children. In this, as in other experiments at the settlement,
we do not believe that what we offer is of great consequence unless
the demonstrations we make and the experience we gain are applicable
to the problems of the community. On no other single interest do the
members of our settlement meet with such unanimity. Years of concern
about individual children might in any case have brought this about, but
irresistible has been the influence exercised by Mrs. Florence Kelley,
now and for many years a member of the settlement family. She has long
consecrated her energies to securing protective legislation throughout
the country for children compelled to labor and, with the late Edgar
Gardner Murphy, of Alabama, suggested the creation of the National Child
Labor Committee. In its ten years’ existence it has affected legislation
in forty-seven states, which have enacted new or improved child labor
laws. On this and on the New York State Committee Mrs. Kelley and I have
served since their creation.
Though much has been accomplished during this decade, the field is
immensely larger than was supposed, and forces inimical to reform, not
reckoned with at first, have been encountered. Despite this opposition,
however, we believe that the abolition of child labor abuses in America
is not very far off.
In Pennsylvania, within a very few years, insistence upon satisfactory
proof of age was strenuously opposed. Officials who should have been
working in harmony with the committee persisted in declaring that
the parent’s affidavit, long before discarded in New York State, was
sufficient evidence, despite the fact that coroners’ inquests after mine
disasters showed child workers of ten and eleven years. The Southern
mill children, the little cranberry-bog workers, the oyster shuckers,
and the boys in glass factories and mines have shown that this disregard
of children is not peculiar to any one section of the country, though
Southern states have been most tenacious of the exemption of children of
“dependent parents” or “orphans” from working-paper requirements.
In the archives at Washington much interesting evidence lies buried in
the unpublished portions of reports of the federal investigation into the
work of women and children. The need of this investigation was originally
urged by settlement people. One mill owner greeted the government
inspectors most cordially and, to show his patriotism, ordered the flag
to be raised above the works. The raising of the flag, as it afterwards
transpired, was a signal to the children employed in the mill to go home.
In the early days of child labor reform in New York the children on
Henry Street would sometimes relate vividly their experience of being
suddenly whisked out of sight when the approach of the factory inspector
was signaled.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account