“As we were falling--Dr. Weiss and I--I released his gun hand, and
reached for my pistol, a Colt .38 special on a .45 frame, loaded with
hollow-point ammunition, which I carried in a shoulder holster. By the
time we hit the deck I had it out and fired one shot into his throat,
under his chin, upward into his head and saw the flesh open up. I
struggled to get out from beneath him, and as I partially freed myself,
all hell broke loose. The others may have waited till I got partially
clear before they fired, for I think I got to my knees by the time they
started, and that probably saved my life. But I was being deafened and
my eyes were burning with particles of powder from those shots.
“Moreover, for all I knew this might have been an attack in force, which
was why I was struggling so desperately to get to my feet. But by the
time I really was on my feet, I could not see any more because of the
muzzle blasts from other guns. While I did not learn this until later,
shots had passed so close to me that the powder burns penetrated my
coat, shirt, and undershirt, and burned my skin beneath, all along my
back. I felt my way blindly down the hall in the direction of the Senate
chamber, with my left hand on the corridor wall and my gun still in my
right hand, till I turned a corner and reached a niche where there was a
marble settee. This was right near the stairway where Huey had gone
down, as I learned later. I was practically blinded for the time. The
settee had a padded seat, and I waited there till Ty Campbell, a state
highway patrolman, saw me and took me to the hospital.
“It was there that I missed my watch and saw the furrow plowed across
the back of my wrist where the scar of it is still visible; also the
pinch or scratch in the web between my right thumb and index finger. I
did not know for two days what had become of my watch, but it was
returned to me later by King Strenzke, chief of the Baton Rouge city
police. Someone had picked it up off the floor at the scene of all the
shooting, and had turned it over to the police while authorities were
still trying to establish the identity of Dr. Weiss.”
* * * * *
Justice Fournet’s statement differs from Roden’s at several points, as
it does from the accounts of Coleman and Frampton, each of which differs
in one detail or another from all the others. Just as it was given, with
none of the discrepancies modified, altered, or omitted, the Fournet
account of what took place continues in the narrative which follows:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account