The logical explanation for this apparent blunder is that the commanders
wanted more sea room than was at hand in the northeast Sea of Japan to
maneuver in the first typhoon and hoped to get well out in the open
Pacific before they could be cornered by the second one. But it turned
northeastward and went faster and farther out in the Pacific than they
had expected. In fact, its forward motion was more than forty miles an
hour in these last hours before its furious winds surrounded the fleet.
It was a bad calculation for the naval commanders and perhaps for the
weather forecasters. Among the latter, H. Arakawa, one of the foremost
typhoon students in Japan, was then on the staff of forecasters in the
Central Meteorological Observatory in Tokyo. He was in part responsible
for the predictions. In 1952 he made the report which was published by
the U. S. Weather Bureau early in 1953. Taking the view of the
weatherman, Arakawa said that although the damage to the fleet was
unfortunate, there was _fortunately_ a magnificent collection of reports
from the central region of the typhoon for scientific study.
The fleet was caught in the central part of the big storm on the
twenty-sixth of September. Among the ships involved, many of them
damaged, were destroyers, cruisers, aircraft carriers, a seaplane
carrier, mine-layers, transport ships, submarines, torpedo boats, and a
submarine depot ship. The fleet suffered damage mostly from the
tremendous waves in the right rear quadrant of the typhoon. Here the
rapid forward motion of the storm was added to the wind circulation and
the seas were driven to excessive heights. In his report, Arakawa had a
footnote: “The bows of two destroyers, _Hatsuyuki_ and _Yugiri_, were
broken off as a result of excessive storm waves, and many officers and
sailors were lost.”
In the calm center, the clouds broke and faint sunlight came through.
The diameter of the eye was nine or ten miles. To the right of the eye,
some of the waves measured more than sixty feet in height. The maximum
roll of the ships in this area—the total angle from port to
starboard—reached 75° on some of the ships. The wind was steadily above
eighty miles an hour; the gusts were not measured but probably went as
high as 125 miles an hour.
Many of the ships took frequent observations while in the typhoon and
the data would have been extremely valuable if released to the storm
hunters at that time, but when the report was published in 1953 a great
deal of new data had been obtained by airplane, both at the
surface—where Arakawa’s observations were confined—and at higher levels.
It was a little more than nine years after this Japanese incident when
the U. S. Third Fleet was caught in a typhoon east of the Philippines
and suffered at least as much damage as the Japanese in 1935.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account