The I. W. W.: A Study of American SyndicalismBrissenden, Paul F. (Paul Frederick)
History
The I. W. W.: A Study of American Syndicalism
Brissenden, Paul F. (Paul Frederick)
Industrial Workers of the World; Syndicalism
13. Resolved, that it be the sense of this convention that only
those who are wage-workers be eligible to membership in this
organization.
16. Whereas, there is already established an International
Bureau of those industrial unions which are based upon the
class struggle, with headquarters at Berlin, therefore be it
Resolved, that this new organization enter into immediate
relations therewith.
20. Resolved, that we condemn militarism in all its forms and
functions, which are jeopardizing our constitutional rights and
privileges in the struggle between capital and labor. Be it
further
Resolved, that any members accepting salaried positions to
defend capitalism, directly or indirectly, should be denied the
privilege of membership in this organization.
To the discussion and emendation of the preamble and constitution
was devoted the bulk of the time during the last five days of the
convention.[139] The preamble drawn up by the committee on constitution
was accepted by the convention practically in the form presented by
that committee, and without dissent except for the second clause. The
first two clauses read as follows:
The working class and the employing class have nothing in
common. There can be no peace so long as hunger and want are
found among the millions of working people, and the few, who
make up the employing class, have all the good things of life.
Between these two classes a struggle must go on until all the
toilers come together on the political, as well as on the
industrial field, and take and hold that which they produce by
their labor, through an economic organization of the working
class, without affiliation with any political party.
The reference to the "political field" in the second clause brought
forth immediate challenge and the whole clause was the subject of
exhaustive debate. Delegate Gilbert, who favored the clause, very
concisely explained its significance.
We are here [he said] to effect an economic organization. There
are two elements in this convention. One element proposes to
do away with political action entirely. Another element is
inclined toward political action. All that this paragraph is
in essence is this: It first of all states very clearly and
plainly that this is primarily an economic organization based
upon the conflict of classes. Secondly, it says in essence
this: That as individuals you are perfectly free to take such
political action as you see fit. As an organization, you
cannot.... Thirdly, it says this: You shall not as an economic
organization stand committed to any political party at present
in existence.[140]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account