The Interdependence of LiteratureCurtis, Georgina Pell
General
The Interdependence of Literature
Curtis, Georgina Pell
Comparative literature
Voltaire, Diderot, D'Holbach and their school in France, with Hume,
Bolingbroke and Gibbon in England, formed a coterie whose desire it was
to edit a vast encyclopaedia, giving the latest discoveries, in
philosophy and science in particular, and in literature in general.
These men became known as the Encyclopaedists, and their history is
fully set forth by Condillac. They rejected all divine revelation and
taught that all religious belief was the working of a disordered mind,
and that physical sensibility is the origin of all our thoughts.
Alternately gross or flippant, or else both, the French philosophers
offered nothing pure or elevating in philosophic thought. Their
teaching spread to England, where the philosophy of the eighteenth
century, less gross than the French, is chiefly distinguished for being
cold and indifferent, rather than actively opposed, to religion. Hume
is a type of the class of thinkers whom we find uncertain and unworthy
of confidence. The histories of Hume, Robertson and Gibbon are the
offspring of this degraded material philosophy of the eighteenth
century. They surpassed the histories of other nations in
comprehensiveness and power, and became standard works in France and
Germany, but in all of them we can trace a lack of true philosophy, due
to the blighting influence of the eighteenth century skepticism; for,
as the greatest minds, in which Christianity and science are blended,
have agreed--"without some reasonable and due idea of the destiny and
end of man, it is impossible to form just and consistent opinions on
the progress of events, and the development and fortunes of nations.
History stripped of philosophy becomes simply a lifeless heap of
useless materials, without either inward unity, right purpose, or
worthy result; while philosophy severed from history results in a
disturbed existence of different sects, allied to formality."
The originator of English philosophy was John Locke, whose teachings
were closely allied to the sensual philosophy of the French. It
remained for the Scottish school under Thomas Reid to combat both the
sensualistic philosophy of Voltaire and Locke, and the skepticism of
Hume. Reid was a sincere lover of truth, a man of lofty character, and
his philosophy, such as it is, is the purest that can be found, more
akin to the profound reasoning of Plato.
In Italy, during the eighteenth century, the theory that experience is
the only ground of knowledge, as taught by Locke and Condillac, gained
some followers; but none of them were men of any great influence.
Gallupi in the beginning of the nineteenth century endeavored to reform
this philosophy; others took up his work, and the result was a change
of thought similar to that brought about by Reid in England and
Scotland.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account