The International Monthly, Volume 4, No. 1, August, 1851Various
History
The International Monthly, Volume 4, No. 1, August, 1851
Various
Art, Modern -- 19th century -- Periodicals; Literature, Modern -- 19th century -- Periodicals; Science -- History -- Periodicals
"It must be admitted that our excellent correspondent has
set forth the claims of 'Adolphe' and 'Alexis,' and similar
interesting abstractions, to the powers of omnipresence and
omniscience, with great candor and becoming gravity. We are
sorry that we cannot follow what many of our readers may
consider so excellent an example. We have no faith in those
dear creatures without surnames: we have no faith in animal
magnetism, either in its lesser or in its larger
pretensions; but we have an unbounded faith in the
imbecility, infatuation, vanity, credulity, and knavery of
which human nature is capable. And we are of opinion that
there is not a single well-authenticated mesmeric phenomenon
which is not fully explicable by the operation of one or
more of these causes, or of the whole of them taken in
conjunction.
"The question in regard to mesmerism is two-fold: _first_,
how is the mesmeric prostration to be accounted for? and
_secondly_, how is it to be disposed of? It may be accounted
for, we conceive, by the natural tendencies just recited,
without its being necessary to postulate any new or unknown
agency; it may be disposed of by the influence of public
opinion, which would very soon put a stop to these pitiable
exhibitions, and very soon extinguish the magnetizer's power
and the patient's susceptibility, if it were but to visit
the performers with the contempt and reprobation they
deserve. A few words on each of these heads may not be out
of place, as a qualifying postscript to the foregoing
letter, which, in our opinion, treats the mesmeric
superstition with far too much indulgence.
"I. The existence of any physical force or fluid in man or
in nature, by which the mesmeric phenomena are induced, has
been distinctly disproved by every carefully conducted
experiment. _No person was ever magnetized when totally
unsuspicious of the operation of which he was the subject._
This is conclusive; because a physical agent, which never
does, _of itself_ and unheralded, produce any effect, is no
physical agent at all. Then, again, let certain persons be
prepared for the magnetic condition, and aware of what is
expected of them, and the effects are equally produced,
whether the intended influence be exerted or not. It seems
simply ridiculous to postulate an _odylic_ (we should like
to be favored with the derivation of this word) fluid to
account for phenomena which show themselves just as
conspicuously when no such fluid is or can be in operation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account