The International Monthly, Volume 5, No. 4, April, 1852Various
History
The International Monthly, Volume 5, No. 4, April, 1852
Various
Art, Modern -- 19th century -- Periodicals; Literature, Modern -- 19th century -- Periodicals; Science -- History -- Periodicals
The further this work proceeds, the more do we feel that it must take
its place as an essentially satisfactory history of the United States.
Mr. Bancroft is thoroughly American in thought and in feeling, without
ceasing to have those larger views and nobler sympathies which result
from cosmopolitan rather than from local training. His style is original
and national. It breathes of the mountain and the prairie--of the great
lakes and wild savannahs of his native land. A strain of wild and
forest-like music swells up in almost every line. The story is told
richly and vividly. It has hitherto been thought by Americans
themselves, even more than by Europeans, that the story of the English
colonies presented but a dreary and lifeless succession of petty
squabbles between the settlers and the crown officers--of unintelligible
persecutions of each other on the ground of differences of opinion in
religion. Mr. Bancroft has shown how ill founded has been this
impression. In his hands American history is full of fine effects.
Steeped in the colors of his imagination, a thousand incidents hitherto
thought dull appear animated and pictorial. Between Hildreth and
Bancroft the difference is immense. In the treatment of the former,
dates, facts, events are duly stated--the criticism is keen, the
chronology indisputable,--but the figures do not live, the narrative
knows no march. The latter is all movement. His men glow with human
purposes,--his story sweeps on with the exulting life of a procession.
Yet because Mr. Bancroft contrives to bring out the more romantic
aspects of his theme, it is not to be supposed that he fails in that
strict regard to truth--truth of character as well as of incident--which
is the historian's first duty, and without which all other qualities are
useless. Of all American writers who have written on the history of
their own country, we would pronounce him to be the most conscientious.
His former volumes were remarkable for the amplitude and accuracy of
their references. The authorities cited were often recondite and
obscure,--yet it was evident that they had been sifted carefully and
critically. The same may be said of the volume before us.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account