The Jewel House: An Account of the Many Romances Connected with the Royal Regalia: Together with Sir Gilbert Talbot's Account of Colonel Blood's PlotYounghusband, G. J. (George John)
History
The Jewel House: An Account of the Many Romances Connected with the Royal Regalia: Together with Sir Gilbert Talbot's Account of Colonel Blood's Plot
Younghusband, G. J. (George John)
Crown jewels -- Great Britain
Sir Henry was nominated, and sat as one of the judges who tried Charles
I, but he with some courage or address escaped signing the death
sentence, and afterwards claimed that he only accepted nomination in
hopes of saving the King. Throughout the Commonwealth he remained Keeper
of the Jewel House, though there were no jewels to guard, for these had
been broken up, defaced, destroyed, and sold by the order of Parliament.
But being one skilled in the etiquette of courts, he made himself useful
as Master of Ceremonies to Foreign Ambassadors, and continued to enjoy
the rich perquisites attaining to the office of Keeper of the Jewel
House.
For forty years Sir Henry Mildmay had grown fat and prosperous on the
proceeds of his office; indeed, he became a very rich man with great
estates and much ready cash to spend. But in 1660 Charles II was
restored to the throne, and Sir Henry Mildmay was immediately pounced
upon to produce the crowns and robes, sceptres, and jewels belonging to
the kingly dignity, of which he was the reputed guardian. At the time
the general impression was that Sir Henry had appropriated these to his
own purposes and sold them to his own advantage; he was in consequence
dubbed “the Knave of Diamonds.” As however has since become clear the
royal emblems, or such as remained, were disposed of under the orders of
Parliament. It may, however, be conjectured that Sir Henry, in
accordance with the usages of the age and the rights of his office,
secured a goodly percentage on the sale prices. His detractors averred
that he had himself valued and bought in the Crown Jewels at the
exceedingly low prices they fetched, and at his leisure disposed of them
at great profit. There is, however, no recorded proof of this.
But Sir Henry Mildmay, whether he had a guilty conscience or not,
thought discretion the better part of valour, and attempted to escape
abroad. He was, however, caught by Lord Winchelsea at Rye in Essex and
sent back to London. He was tried in 1661 at the Bar of the House of
Commons, and sentenced to be degraded from all his honours and titles.
Furthermore, he was sentenced to be annually drawn on a hurdle through
the streets of London from the Tower to Tyburn, then passed under the
gallows, and again dragged back to the Tower. This penalty was to be
exacted on each anniversary of the day on which sentence had been passed
on Charles I, that is January 27th. Whether Sir Henry ever took this
ride is not clear, but probably he did more than once, for it was only
in 1664 that the Lords in mitigation ordered him to be transported to
Tangiers. On the way to his exile, however, he died at the town of
Antwerp. His vast accumulations of wealth were forfeited to the Crown,
his estate at Wanstead being of sufficient importance to be assigned to
James, Duke of York.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account