Now the Greeks of the fourth century knew of esoteric religious
communities, and they knew of nations that professed to be especially
attached to religious practices. But groups of mystae engaged in rapt
spiritual converse were never coextensive with entire nations. And
“religious” nations might be simply those among whom an elaborate state
cult was punctiliously performed. Even theocracies were no unheard-of
thing. Sidon was such a theocracy; _i.e._ theoretically ruled by the god
and administered by his priest.[83] But that too was largely formal, not
strikingly different from the patronage of Athena over Athens. The
Jewish theocracy was a more intensely real matter than this, but that
fact could not have been apparent to either merchant or traveler, from
whom in the last analysis the information about Jews before 300 B.C.E.
must have come. If, therefore, Greeks found something in the religious
customs of the Jews that aroused immediate attention, it was the very
general interest and participation of the masses in the theological
discussion as it was carried on in the synagogues.
This fact alone would justify the use of the term
φιλόσοφοι, “philosophers.” Theology, the knowledge of the
high gods, was an accredited branch of wisdom which the Platonic
Socrates strove with a little too palpable irony to elicit from
Euthyphro.[84] Those who busied themselves with it were properly termed
philosophers, whatever may have been the conclusions they reached. If we
venture to assume that the conclusions which the Jews had long reached
were actually known, Theophrastus’ phrase could only have been
confirmed. An exclusive monotheism was in every sense a philosophic and
not a popular concept.
A contemporary of Theophrastus was Clearchus of Soli in Cyprus. Of his
writings none whatever has survived, except quotations in other books.
Among other works he wrote dialogues more or less after the Platonic
manner, in which his master Aristotle is interlocutor in place of
Socrates. One of these dialogues was marked, no doubt as a subtitle,
περὶ ὕπνου, “On Sleep,” and in this dialogue an encounter
of Aristotle with a Hellenized Jew is described.
We need not seriously consider the question whether such an encounter
actually occurred. It is not in the least likely that it did. The only
inferences that may be drawn from this passage are those that concern
Clearchus.
Aristotle is the narrator, and tells his story, as he takes pains to
say, according to the rules formulated in Rhetoric.[85] He had met a man
in Asia, a Jew of Coele-Syria by birth, but Grecized in speech and in
soul. This Greek or Jew voluntarily sought out Aristotle and his
associates, πειρώμενος αὐτῶν τῆς σοφίας, “to find out
whether they were really as wise as their reputation.” On the whole,
however, he had given rather than received edification.[86]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account