The journal of Frederick Horneman's travels, from Cairo to Mourzouk, the capital of the kingdom of Fezzan, in Africa, in the years 1797-8Hornemann, Friedrich
History
The journal of Frederick Horneman's travels, from Cairo to Mourzouk, the capital of the kingdom of Fezzan, in Africa, in the years 1797-8
Hornemann, Friedrich
Berber languages; Fezzan (Libya) -- Description and travel; Libyan Desert -- Description and travel
Page 23, Mr. Horneman informs us, “_that the northern part of the
building is erected on a native calcareous rock, rising about eight
feet above the level of the area, within a circumvallation_,” which
he particularly and exclusively describes, and which will be a subject
of further dissertation. He then mentions, “that two vast stones
of the roof have fallen in from the southern part of the building,
and lay with their bottom nearly on a level with the plain of the
outward enclosure;” and he was thence led to conjecture, that the
base or floor of the southern division, was originally lower than
that of the northern end.
The difference in measurement or estimate of height stated by the
two travellers, strongly corroborates the fact.
It may be premised, that when an object is of no great altitude,
an estimate of height may be made on mere inspection or view, with
much more accuracy than any other line of dimension. A comparison
with known objects, the stature of any human figure near, nay, the
very person of the observer himself, will furnish a sort of scale
for reference, by which he may compute from four to five times his
own height with considerable precision.
A difference so great as that of from eighteen to twenty-seven feet
in estimating the altitude of the building at Siwah, could not occur
between two the most hasty and inaccurate observers, in noting the
height of the same object. The object itself, therefore, must be
considered as different; and in the one case, to be that of the _wall
within_, and in the other case, that of _the temple from without_.
Mr. Brown taking his measurements in the clear, would ascertain
the perpendicular of the wall from a part of the pediment or floor,
the most clear and perfect; and this was, at the northern end. The
dilapidations in the southern part of the building, do not appear
to have attracted his notice in any other consideration, than as
mere ruins: and merely as such, the unequal and broken surface would
not be preferred for placing a rod in measurement to the summit, or
from whence to look up and make a calculation of height. Mr. Brown
accordingly measured the height from a proper base at the northern
end, and found it to be eighteen feet. It has been already cited
from the journal of Mr. Horneman, that the northern end was built on
an isolated rock, rising eight feet above the plain of the general
enclosure. The top of the wall from north to south, must have run
on a level, and in a direct line: and the actual building of the
southern part must have been eight feet higher than that of the
northern end; and the entire building _from without_ must have
appeared, and in truth, have been, twenty-six feet high, even to
conform with Mr. Brown’s description from within.
The two travellers in other points agree, as to the architecture
of the building, and sculpture on the walls, concurring in proof,
that it was of the highest antiquity, and of Egyptian origin.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account