The Journal of Prison Discipline and Philanthropy (New Series, No. 3, January 1864)Philadelphia Society for Alleviating the Miseries of Public Prisons
History
The Journal of Prison Discipline and Philanthropy (New Series, No. 3, January 1864)
Philadelphia Society for Alleviating the Miseries of Public Prisons
Charities -- Periodicals; Prisons -- Periodicals
To produce the ends proposed by the means which we recommend,—namely, an
arousing of the conscience by gentle appeals to the hidden affections,
by those whose circumstances qualify them to gain access to the
confidence of the moral patients,—we must have many devoted visitors,
willing to labor beyond the sight and without the applause of the world;
and they, when properly vouched for in all requisite qualifications,
must have free access to those whom they would aid. It is known that
this Society has, by the laws of the Commonwealth, a sort of special
privilege to visit in prison, by its members, the miserable, the
wretched, the vicious and the criminal, to breathe through the gratings
of the cell words of admonition, comfort and hope, or to open the door
and participate in the confinement of the prisoner, and address him in
accents that may, in the silence of all around him, awaken him to holy
resolves. But even this privilege, greatly used, and, as we believe,
never abused, is imperfect without a concurrent action on the part of
those who directly administer the affairs of the prison. If they oppose
obstacles to free access to the incarcerated, no assertion or proof of
right will make the path easy, or often trod by those who represent us,
especially the females; it will be found to add the disgust of
contention with keepers, to the inconvenience of visits to the guarded.
And still less effective will be any efforts by christian
philanthropists to alleviate the misery of the cells, and improve the
minds of the occupants, if their visits of mercy are followed by the
coarse jeers of the unrefined and unsympathizing, ridiculing the efforts
of the self-sacrificing visitor, and shaming the half-resolved prisoner;
nor would it be better, if the regular official should, from bigotry or
bad design, denounce the teaching of the voluntary visitor, because it
might tend to other creeds than his own, or because it proceeded from
other sources and in other channels than that by which his creed was
formed, or those in which his conscience directed. It will be readily
understood how potent such disturbing causes would be in producing
injurious effects,—in marring, indeed, the good work of the moral
teachers in our prisons. It seems therefore meet to say here, that while
it is supposed that those who are entrusted with the care of the
prisoner, in both Penitentiary and County Prison, have some
well-established views of doctrine, and are connected with some
religious denomination, it is not known that any of them have attempted
to interrupt the work of the committee and agents of the Society, by
hindering the access to prisoners, or by disturbing with contrary
teaching the effect produced. On the contrary, it seems a duty at this
time and in this place to bear testimony to the unfailing urbanity with
which our visitors are received and treated at the prisons, and the aid
always rendered to give them ready access to the cells and to the minds
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account