The Knickerbocker, Vol. 10, No. 5, November 1837Various
History
The Knickerbocker, Vol. 10, No. 5, November 1837
Various
Periodicals
More important opponents have been found among the traders in the
current literature of the day; as well your 'penny-a-liner,' as the
man who has had the courage to write a book, and the good fortune to
vend a copy-right, have been unmercifully witty at the expense of my
brethren; and without waiting to inquire whether any important truth
was concerned in phrenological investigation, they have only sought
to know whether any thing ludicrous could be derived from it. These
oracles Ignorance consulted, and the response was--a laugh.
One American author, whose writings denote the combined action of
mirthfulness and destructiveness, very magnanimously allowed the
phrenologist the distinction of being one of the 'Three Wise Men of
Gotham.' He is portrayed as sallying forth with no less enthusiasm
than La Mancha's renowned knight, nor with less 'rueful visage,'
upon a forlorn pilgrimage to some Golgotha, in quest of specimens to
illustrate the truths of his mighty discovery; while one of his high
compeers sails in quest of the great central hole of the earth; and
the other stands in a glow of intense rapture, viewing the sudden
perfectability of human nature. But alas for such noble enthusiasm!
If our grave author's relation of the facts be genuine, (and who
doubts his historical accuracy?) the
'Three little boys that a-sliding went,
All on a summer's day,'
met with an enviable fate, compared with that of these children
of wisdom. The captain's boat never entered the wished-for haven;
the philanthropist failed to make the lion and the lamb lie down
together in peace and safety; and the unhappy phrenologist, in his
'meditations among the tombs,' erred in pronouncing upon the traits
of mind that once inhabited the poor fragments he had gathered up;
and he found his science blown to atoms, because he mistook the
cranium of a fool for that of a philosopher!--a mistake which the
vanity of an author might possibly make in his own case, with far
better opportunities of judging aright.
A science that could survive an attack like this, must have had
_brains_ indeed to support it; and he who ventured to proclaim its
truth, after a world's laugh had announced its folly, must have
possessed more than an ordinary share of moral courage.
But the science of Human Nature survived this satire, and having
outlived the sneers of learned prejudice, and the obstreperous mirth
of vulgar ignorance, now commands much of the serious attention of
mankind.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account