The last days of the French monarchyBelloc, Hilaire
History
The last days of the French monarchy
Belloc, Hilaire
France -- History -- Revolution, 1789-1799
Other great names of the French Revolution are obscured by the heat of
the main struggle in 1793 by the fact that they perished or fell into
oblivion or betrayed their original convictions. The violent prejudices
that attach to the passions of such moments have made it difficult for
the chief men of 1789-95 to be rightly judged. For whether we seek the
testimony of friends or of enemies, we are aware of worthless
exaggeration. In the case of Lafayette we do not suffer from these
causes of distortion. He was indeed most bitterly denounced,--in the
crisis of his life when he abandoned his army there was hardly anyone to
praise him,--but he was not present among the French in those moments of
superhuman exaltation which followed upon the great war, and therefore
he escaped unbalanced praise and blame therein. On the other hand, he
did not perish in that storm as did countless others, nor did he deserve
or receive oblivion upon its close. On the contrary, he entered public
life again and played a great part in it. Added to such opportunities
for being rightly judged, his own rigid adherence to his original
principles has gained him the reward which always attaches to such
fidelity--an untroubled place in history. From all these causes he can,
if we take the trouble to watch him narrowly, be seen clearly by
posterity.
Let us then attempt a summary judgment of his character. The central
axis upon which that character turned may readily be perceived and
defined, for it was at once so simple and fixed within so slight an
accretion of secondary qualities that it is plainly visible through
them.
Lafayette was essentially of that type which has had for its philosophy,
perhaps from the beginning of society, the scheme to which antiquity
gave the title of “stoic.” He was immovable in the service of those
truths which he perceived; but the truths which he perceived were few,
obvious, and though of vast, yet not of the very last, importance. He
conceived that an adhesion to such truths was sufficient for man and
still more certainly sufficient for himself.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account