The Letters of the Duke of Wellington to Miss J., 1834-1851: Edited, with Extracts from the Diary of the LatterWellington, Arthur Wellesley, Duke of
History
The Letters of the Duke of Wellington to Miss J., 1834-1851: Edited, with Extracts from the Diary of the Latter
Wellington, Arthur Wellesley, Duke of
Wellington, Arthur Wellesley, Duke of, 1769-1852 -- Correspondence
This letter is interesting as giving a glimpse of that softer side of
the Duke's nature, generally lost sight of in contemplation of his
sterner characteristics.
LONDON, July 13, 1846.
MY DEAR MISS J.,--I have received your letters of the 12^th and
Friday last on the subject of the loss I recently sustained of my
Grandson, the eldest Son of my second son. Poor boy! he died on
Tuesday! By the Mercy of God! the second son, an infant has
recovered. But at one time I was apprehensive that the grief of
the Mother who was nursing the youngest child would have affected
Her Health; and that we should have lost that Child; and
eventually the Mother. But thank God! Both are now safe! I am
very sensible of your kindness upon this occasion. I wish that it
was in my power to tell you that I have any prospect of being
able to go to see you! But I cannot expect to be able to do so at
present! Believe me, My Dear Miss J. Ever Yours
Most faithfully,
WELLINGTON.
"The Duke's next letter, dated July 23rd, 1846, is expressive of
concern at my having caught cold, adding; 'I am very sorry still to
be unable to fix a time at which I can go to see you.'
"In the Duke's next letter, dated Aug. 13th, he writes--'I have to
express my acknowledgments for several letters which I have
received from you since you left London and I am very happy to
learn that you like your situation there. I am still very much
occupied by my duties in London but hope the Parliament will soon
be prorogued and that I may be enabled to quit London and move to
other parts of the Country where my presence is required;' and in
the Duke's next, dated Aug. 17th, he writes; 'My duties will
require my removal at a distance from London for at least two
months or more.'
"In the Duke's next letter, dated Aug. 25th, he writes; 'I am under
the necessity of going out of Town early tomorrow.'"
Sept. 1st, 1846.
I am concerned to find that my silence is considered _unkind_ and
that this unkindness is aggravated by my having travelled up from
Portsmouth on Sunday! It is true! I did so. I was sorry for it.
But my services to the Public rendered necessary my being in
London early Monday morning which I could not have performed if I
had not travelled on Sunday. However you shall not again have
reason to complain of disappointment. I announce to you that I
will write no more. If you could have attended to anything so
trifling as what you might read in the Newspapers about Me! You
might have seen that in the last week I was occupied at a
distance from London during five days out of the seven and that
in that space of time I have travelled and rode little short of
800 miles.
Indorsed by Miss J. "Who is he that saith and it cometh to pass when
THE _Lord_ commandeth it not?"
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account