The life and correspondence of Sir Anthony Panizzi, K.C.B., Vol. 1 (of 2): Late principal librarian of the British museum, senator of Italy, etc.Fagan, Louis
History
The life and correspondence of Sir Anthony Panizzi, K.C.B., Vol. 1 (of 2): Late principal librarian of the British museum, senator of Italy, etc.
Fagan, Louis
Panizzi, Anthony, Sir, 1797-1879
The first of his London publications (“Extract from Italian Prose
Writers, for the use of Students in the London University”) appeared in
1828, and was followed, soon afterwards, by “An Elementary Italian
Grammar.” In addition to the compilation of these works, he now began to
contribute frequently to the Reviews. The first of these contributions
appeared in the _Foreign Review and Continental Miscellany_; it was a
criticism of a work entitled “I Lombardi alia prima Crociata. T. Grassi.
Mil^o., 1826. 8vo.” This was followed by another, a very interesting
review of the “Storia d’Italia dal 1789 al 1814, da Carlo Botta. 8 vols.
1824. 12mo.” To this last the critic extends at least as much justice as
mercy, and spares no pains to refute (which he does by the clearest
evidence) many of the statements put forward in the work as historical
facts. Of the author he gives the following notice:—
“A Piedmontese physician, who, in 1794, after two years’ imprisonment in
Piedmont, for his warm support of the principles of the French
Revolution, made his escape (Heaven knows how!) to France, and was
employed in his professional capacity in the French army. When this army
entered Piedmont, Botta fought with it against the King and his country.
He went to Corfu in the capacity of army physician. The King of Piedmont
having been obliged to abdicate, the French General, Joubert, appointed
a provisional government, which the historian, of course, mentions with
high eulogium, inasmuch as of this very government Signor Botta was a
worthy member.”
As to his diction, the reviewer says:—“We wish not to criticize minutely
Signor Botta’s style.... The Italian edition, however, we have read,
and, save only school-boy themes and college exercises, more coldness,
stiffness, and affectation is scarcely to be found.”
Apart, however, from the historical blunders and style of the work,
another cause existed to call forth the hostile criticism of Panizzi.
This will appear from the opening passage of the review, which runs
thus:—“The name of Carlo Botta has long been known as that of an
historian. While yet a member of the legislative body, during the reign
of Napoleon, he published at Paris a ‘History of American Independence.’
Whether it so happened that his notions on liberty have been since
wonderfully revolutionized, or his bitter vituperations of England and
laudatory tropes in favour of America, propitiated the then rancorous
hatred of the French towards this nation we know not, but his work was
eminently successful.”
Undoubtedly it was Botta’s ill-feeling towards England, more than the
demerits of the work itself, which called for such severe and scathing
comments. The review was translated into Italian, and circulated amongst
Botta’s compatriots.
Other articles on various subjects appeared in the same journal up to
the year 1830.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account