The Life and Letters of George John Romanes, M.A., LL.D., F.R.S.Romanes, George John
Science
The Life and Letters of George John Romanes, M.A., LL.D., F.R.S.
Romanes, George John
Naturalists -- Great Britain -- Biography; Romanes, George John, 1848-1894
I should not, however, have written only to trouble you with
expressions of sympathy. I desire to ask you one or two questions
with reference to an article on Hybridism which I have written
for the 'Encyclopædia Britannica,' and the corrected proof of
which I send. It is in chief part an epitome of your own chapters
upon the subject, and therefore you need not trouble to read the
whole, unless you care to see whether I have been sufficiently
clear and accurate. But there are two points on which I should
like to have your opinion, both for my own benefit and for that
of my readers. First, I think it is desirable to append a list of
the more important works bearing upon the subject, and if I make
such a list I should not like to trust to my own information,
lest I should do unwitting injustice to some observing writers.
If, therefore, you could, _without taking any special trouble_,
jot down from memory the works you think most deserving of
mention, I think it would be of benefit to the reading public.
_From C. Darwin, Esq._
Down: November 14, 1880.
My dear Romanes,--Many thanks for your kind sympathy. My wife's
sister was, I fully believe, as good and generous a woman as ever
walked this earth.
The proof-sheets have not arrived, but probably will to-morrow. I
shall like to read them, though I may not be able to do so _very_
quickly, as I am bothered with a heap of little jobs which must
be done. I will send by to-day's post a large book by Focke,
received a week or two ago, on Hybrids, and which I have not had
time to look at, but which I see in Table of Contents includes
full history of subject and much else besides. It will aid you
far better than I can; for I have now been so long attending
to other subjects, and with old age, I fear I could make no
suggestions worth anything. Formerly I knew the subject well.
Kölreuter, Gärtner, and Herbert are certainly far the most
trustworthy authorities. There was also a German, whose name I
mention in 'Origin,' who wrote on Hybrid Willows. Naudin, who is
often quoted, I have much less confidence in. By the way, Nägeli
(whom many think the greatest botanist in Germany) wrote a few
years ago on Hybridism; I cannot remember title, but I will hunt
for it if you wish. The title will be sure to be in Focke.
I quite agree with what you say about Passiflora. Herbert
observed an analogous case in Crinum.
November 15, 1880.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive