The Life and Times of Queen Victoria; vol. 3 of 4Wilson, Robert
History
The Life and Times of Queen Victoria; vol. 3 of 4
Wilson, Robert
Great Britain -- History -- Victoria, 1837-1901; Victoria, Queen of Great Britain, 1819-1901
public opinion in France, and the recriminations of the Press in both
countries caused Persigny to warn Palmerston that war between them would
soon be inevitable. Count Flahault and Lord Palmerston held a
conversation on the subject, in which they discussed the chances of war
in the frankest manner--each vaunting the undeniable superiority of his
country in battle.[64] Count Flahault is supposed to have been impressed
with Palmerston’s demonstration that victory in such a struggle must
rest on English banners, and to have succeeded in soothing down the
angry feeling against England, which then raged at the French Court. The
real reason why all danger of a rupture passed away was that Persigny’s
favourite argument--namely, that war with England meant the
[Illustration: THE CURFEW TOWER, WINDSOR CASTLE.]
destruction of the dynasty--prevailed. Moreover, Napoleon saw plainly
that as every European Power was afraid of France, and as no European
Power had anything to dread from England, Europe in a war between
England and France would not be on the side of the latter Power. But no
sooner did France suggest that the Treaty arrangements of 1815 might be
rectified, than Russia hinted that the same process might be applied
with advantage to the Treaty of 1856. The old pretext for opening up the
Eastern Question--namely, the oppressiveness of the Turkish
Government--lay ready to Russia’s hands. The English Cabinet, in reply
to Russia’s communications on the subject, insisted that the plots of
foreign intriguers in Bosnia, Bulgaria, and Servia were really at the
root of the miseries of the people. Russia, in raising this question,
had assumed that France would help her. But Napoleon’s eyes were fixed
not on the Danube but on the Rhine; so Russian hopes of aid from France
were doomed to disappointment. The next move on the European chess-board
justified the anticipations which the Queen held out after Lord John
Russell’s speech of the 24th of March. Finding that England no longer
leaned solely on France, Austria and Prussia suggested that they should
come to an understanding with England, by which they bound each other to
oppose every future disturbance of frontiers in Europe--a step, however,
which her Majesty shrank from taking. At her suggestion, the Cabinet
agreed to a compact that each of the Powers should give the others
warning of any projected disturbances of territory as soon as they were
heard of, and frankly discuss their bearings; and of these disturbances
one was already imminent in Southern Italy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account