It is mentioned by Bullinger and all his contemporaries that Zwingli
spoke out decidedly against this treaty from the pulpit and whenever he
found opportunity; and they seem to infer from the strength and
clearness of papers concerning it issued from Zurich, that he had the
chief hand in their composition. But the Confederates worked against
him with just as much zeal. Not only did envoys from Bern, Luzern, Uri,
Unterwalden, Zug and Solothurn, along with the French ambassador
Lameth, present, in the name of all the others, petitions, expressions
of regard, and even hints at grievous consequences in case of a
refusal, but written letters came also from the rural districts and
congregations, demanding a subscription of the treaty. Albert von Stein
and others like him, were seen traveling repeatedly from place to place
throughout the canton.
Under these circumstances the government resorted to a natural
expedient. It declared that it must first hear the voice of the people,
and then the great council would decide.
Members of the council were sent into all the bailiwicks, to lay before
the assembled commons, first the treaty itself, and then, a written
explanation of its several articles, and ask their patient examination
of it, and also a communication of their views, in writing, to the
government. With the league and its significance to the Confederacy the
more circumstantial history of the country begins. On the contrary, the
real voice of the people ought to be plain to us from the answers of
the commons. The records may be quoted in the true-hearted language of
the time, and a beginning made with Winterthur.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account