[82] In his _History of the Catholic Church in Scotland_, translated
by Father H. Blair, Canon Bellesheim says (Vol. iii. p. 347) that
she was probably received into the Church in 1600. But Father Forbes
Leith, in his _Narrative_ (pp. 272 _seq_.) gives an authority
stating it to have taken place in 1598.
See also a very interesting article on "Anne of Denmark," by the
Rev. J. Stevenson, in _The Month_, Vol. 16 (xxxv.) pp. 256-265.
[83] _History of England_, from 1603-42. By S. R. Gardiner, Vol. i.
p. 142. Also Degli Effetti to Del Bufalo, June 13/23, 16/26; Persons
to Aldobrandino, September 18/28, _Roman Transcripts_, R.O.
[84] _History of England_, Gardiner, Vol. i, p. 116. Also Degli
Effetti to Del Bufalo, Aug. 11, 1/11, _Roman Transcripts_, R.O.
[85] _History of England_, Gardiner, Vol. i. p. 142.
Now to any good Catholic, especially to an exceedingly zealous convert
in his first fervour, like Sir Everard Digby, a Protestant king might be
tolerable, provided he treated his Catholic subjects properly; but a
court presided over by a queen, herself a convert, who was a most
indifferent Catholic, if not an apostate,[86] would be odious in the
extreme. It was difficult enough, in any case, to make many simple
Catholics understand that there was anything very wrong in avoiding
persecution by putting in an occasional appearance at the Protestant
churches, without joining in the service, if they heard mass when they
could, and went regularly to confession and communion; but the
difficulty was immensely increased when they heard that the greatest
lady in the land, who was herself a Catholic, did that very thing.
Again, the country-gentlemen of high estate, Sir Everard Digby among
them, suffered fines and penalties for their faith; yet here was the
Catholic queen herself, contently living in the greatest luxury, and
yielding on the most important points of her religion, in order to
obtain it.[87] No wonder, therefore, that Sir Everard Digby absented
himself from Court, however impolitic it may have been in him to do so.
[86] In her _Queens of England_, Miss Strickland gives her authority
for the statement that Queen Ann died "in edifying communion with
the Church of England."
[87] Her practical concealment of her religion may have been chiefly
on her husband's account. Father Abercromby, S.J., who received her
into the Church, wrote that James I. said to her:--"Rogo te, mea
uxor, si non potes sine hujusmodi (sacerdote) vivere, utaris quam
poteris, secretissime, alias periclitabitur corona nostra."
Bellesheim's Hist., p. 453.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account