The Life of Ludwig van Beethoven, Volume IIThayer, Alexander Wheelock
History
The Life of Ludwig van Beethoven, Volume II
Thayer, Alexander Wheelock
Beethoven, Ludwig van, 1770-1827
Some, says he, Beethoven’s particular friends, assert that it is
just this symphony which is his masterpiece, that this is the true
style for high-class music, and that if it does not please now,
it is because the public is not cultured enough, artistically, to
grasp all these lofty beauties; after a few thousand years have
passed it will not fail of its effect. Another faction denies
that the work has any artistic value and professes to see in it
an untamed striving for singularity which had failed, however, to
achieve in any of its parts beauty or true sublimity and power. By
means of strange modulations and violent transitions, by combining
the most heterogeneous elements, as for instance when a pastoral
in the largest style is ripped up by the basses, by three horns,
etc., a certain undesirable originality may be achieved without
much trouble; but genius proclaims itself not in the unusual and
the fantastic, but in the beautiful and the sublime. Beethoven
himself proved the correctness of this axiom in his earlier works.
The third party, a very small one, stands midway between the
others--it admits that the symphony contains many beauties, but
concedes that the connection is often disrupted entirely, and that
the inordinate length of this longest, and perhaps most difficult
of all symphonies, wearies even the cognoscenti, and is unendurable
to the mere music-lover; it wishes that H. v. B. would employ his
acknowledgedly great talents in giving us works like his symphonies
in C and D, his ingratiating Septet in E-flat, the intellectual
Quintet in D (C major?) and others of his early compositions which
have placed B. forever in the ranks of the foremost instrumental
composers. It fears, however, that if Beethoven continues on his
present path both he and the public will be the sufferers.... The
public and Herr van Beethoven, who conducted, were not satisfied
with each other on this evening; the public thought the symphony
too heavy, too long, and Beethoven himself too discourteous,
because he did not nod his head in recognition of the applause
which came from a portion of the audience.
This clear, compendious and valuable statement of the conflicting
opinions of the first auditors of the “Eroica” renders farther
citations superfluous; but a story--characteristic enough to be
true--may be added: that Beethoven, in reply to the complaints of too
great length, said, in substance: “If ~I~ write a symphony an hour
long it will be found short enough!” He refused positively to make any
change in the work, but deferred to public opinion so far, as, upon
its publication, to affix to the title of the Symphony a note to the
effect, that on account of its great length it should be played near
the beginning of a concert, before the audience was become weary.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account