The Life of Ludwig van Beethoven, Volume IIThayer, Alexander Wheelock
History
The Life of Ludwig van Beethoven, Volume II
Thayer, Alexander Wheelock
Beethoven, Ludwig van, 1770-1827
This volume contains the first sketches of Nos. 11, 18, 15a, 17a and
18a (appendix) of Jahn’s edition; Nos. 1 and 5 occur, but not in the
original studies; Nos. 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 are either entirely
wanting or only come up in mere fragmentary afterthoughts, as No. 9,
on page 51, where Beethoven has written at the top of the page: “in
the duet between P. and R.” and just below: “dann schleich ich,” with
a hint (4 bars of music unisono) for the accompaniment. Afterthoughts
for the duet “Um in die Ehe”--~Fidelio~ and ~Marcelline~--occur also
on pages 23, 344, and possibly one or two others, but not more.
The studies for ~Fidelio’s~ recitative “Ach brich noch nicht” and
aria “Komm Hoffnung” (No. 11), which are found near the end of the
volume, seem to form a marked exception to the rule; but if these are
really the first sketches, their appearance after the final scenes is
explained by two remarks in Beethoven’s hand on page 344: “Duetto with
Müller (~Marcelline~) and ~Fidelio~ aside,” and “Aria for ~Fidelio~,
another text which agrees with her.” These notes clearly indicate a
change of plan in connection with the duet, and that the beautiful air,
“Komm Hoffnung,” did not stand in Sonnleithner’s original text.
[Sidenote: PATIENT LABOR ON THE OPERA]
The other current error thoroughly exploded by the sketchbook is
this, namely, that the noblest passages in the opera are a sort of
spontaneous outpouring in music of feelings and sentiments awakened,
or rendered intense and vivid, by the unfortunate love-affairs of the
composer. Now, there is nothing from the first page to the last of this
manuscript that conveys the impression of any such spontaneity. Every
number, as it now stands complete in the score, was the tardy result of
persevering labor--of the most painstaking study.
Where Jahn says: “I have not had an opportunity to study many of
Beethoven’s sketchbooks, but I have found no instance in which one was
not compelled to recognize that the material chosen was not the best,
or to deplore that the material which he rejected had not been used,”
he might have added, with truth, that some of the first ideas noted to
passages, now among the gems of the opera, are commonplace and trivial
to such a degree, that one can hardly attribute them to Beethoven. Yet,
there they are in his own hand. Jahn’s compendious general description
of the contents of this manuscript cannot be improved, except in a
single passage, in which, probably trusting his memory a little too
much, he conveys the mistaken (as we think) impression, that the aria
of ~Marcelline~ is here first sketched.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account